BoggLed in Ohio
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2014
- Messages
- 685
- Reaction score
- 429
SW on 3/17 was for everything including the inside of his home from which it has been reported that LE removed evidence ( this does not mean evidence implicated his involvement...only that they took stuff) I think also that RL would not agree to spend time in jail on a probation violation and agree to have the inside of his home searched just as an elaborate ruse...JMO
No, he had no choice about the jail part anyways because he apparently really did drive under his suspended license and probation... all I'm saying is maybe they told him not to mention anything about any cameras he had and not to mention any suspicions he had and not to mention maybe he has seen that guy around before.