Made a new cleaned-up version of the animated gif:
______________
The first
original frame (this happened first):
The second
original frame (this happened next):
These 2 images may play a trick on the viewer, when looking at which image came first. Here is why, IMO:
When LE published the two images of the POI/BG, they did not identify the sequential relationship. MSM then went ahead and even reversed the sequence and vice versa.
The frames were not rotated, aligned and cropped to match to begin with by LE. But why? Here is an illustration, which frame was first and why. Look at the reference lines and you will understand:
It is very possible, that the rotation between the original frames - these 2 images being app. .5 seconds apart IMO - ,
is the result of Libby ( if she took the video herself)
shaking her hand or generally moving as opposed to being stationary while taking the video! Otherwise it would make little to no sense to me, that LE would have released it that way.
Yes, they could have cropped it according to my reference-line illustration above. But I strongly believe, there is movement and there may be even more and faster movement on the remaining frames (if applicable), as the POI /BG was approaching.
Movement would additionally support the idea, that Libby was possibly aware of the situation. Just a thought.
All IMO
-Nin