Oregonmama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2012
- Messages
- 7,768
- Reaction score
- 38,398
Can someone please bring forward the twist quote? Tia.
The article is in the media thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can someone please bring forward the twist quote? Tia.
In MOO opinion it didn't have to relate to the 13th or 14th. He could have have a gun he wasn't allowed if that is a condition of his probation, could have missed a probation meeting, if not allowed to drink a beer in the fridge.....From MYO in reviewing court records it seemed he should have his license back by now but cannot confirm, so MOO. I just don't know why he violated probation, IMO it is pretty easy to do and up to the "system" to decide when/if to enforce it.Then there's the problem of driving with a suspended license (I don't think we've established if that was the case, though). Whatever he was up to on the 13th, it was something that pertained to his parole. Legal or not.
This is a strange statement and makes me think one of the girls in particular was the main target and the other just happened to be in the way. Maybe one of the girls had a chance to run at the beginning but chose to stay. I wonder if he did something to the first girl to get her out of the way quickly, hid her body, then forced the second girl to a nearby barn or something until everyone stopped searching for the night.
Once things were quiet, 3 am or so he could have forced the second girl back to the location of the first girl and this is where he left them both.
At this point I imagine getting out of there wouldn't have been too difficult because the search was called off around 11pm so there would have only been friends and family searching if anyone at that time of the morning on that first night.
Is it often in a big case like this that LE keep so quiet in regards to the COD or is this unusual in America?
BBM I agree. What was the outcome of his court appearance the other day? I haven't heard and just got back on here from a few days ago.Wondering were theories will go when RL is released and goes home. Jmo
Will I EVER be able to post ANYTHING correctly the FIRST time?:gaah:
After thinking about it I was going to edit my post but I'll just add here that honestly it wouldn't even have to be someone working in the town, the same could be true for someone visiting anyone living there or passing through for some other reason.
On the 13th - especially at 6:30pm - there would have been no reason to think there was a perpetrator at all, let alone one hiding in his buildings.On the evening of the 13th if I had returned to my ranch and was asked if my property could be searched...I would say yes and I would be very cautious. I would ask the police to go through my buildings for fear of a perpetrator hiding. RL seemed very calm.
I'm wondering if Bikers/drug dealers are involved? JMO but those types of people usually don't rat out on one another (if they know what's good for them) :scared:
Thank you, Websight. Bringing it over from the media thread:
*********************
This statement seems odd to me:
"I wasn't there, yeah, I think the love those two girls apparently had for each other is probably why they stayed together and unfortunately it caused their death."
What does this mean? That maybe one was the intended victim but the other stayed? Or one had a chance to get away? Their love for each other causing their death? I hate to overanalyze and read anything into statements that might not be there, but this is wierd, imo.
I agree, but if he indeed had walked that bridge many times, you would think that someone had to have seen him at some point, especially if it's a hang out for local kids. Somebody would have said: "Oh, that's so-and-so!" This whole case is so frustrating.
After thinking about it I was going to edit my post but I'll just add here that honestly it wouldn't even have to be someone working in the town, the same could be true for someone visiting anyone living there or passing through for some other reason.
That's my theory. What other local or semi local person wouldn't have been firmly identified by now. Gangs operate illegally just like that based on confidence they will be covered.
RL's torso/upper body is much longer and taller compared to the length of his legs-- versus the person on the bridge. Just my opinion. RL's body is sorta not in proportion if that makes any sense. The bridge perpetrator looks more "normal."
Original Inside Edition picture:
Merged next to POI/BG by me:
Disclaimer: RL may or may not be The POI/BG. The POI/BG may or may not be the killer of Abby and Libby.
All IMO
-Nin
Original Inside Edition picture:
Merged next to POI/BG by me:
Disclaimer: RL may or may not be The POI/BG. The POI/BG may or may not be the killer of Abby and Libby.
All IMO
-Nin
I took it as the girls had a tight friendship bond. JMO, but if I was in that situation and felt threatened and paralyzed with fear, i would stay with my best friend too and not escape unless we could leave together......