Oregonmama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2012
- Messages
- 7,623
- Reaction score
- 36,898
Wouldn't they have to cross it to get to where they were found.
They were taken else where and dumped later where they were found, JMO
Wouldn't they have to cross it to get to where they were found.
interesting. i had never thought of that.I believe the photo was probably deliberately skewed and blurred. The person who was there would recognize himself. IMO it was deliberate strategy by LE to rattle BG.
This is my theory and it may totally be wrong or only partially correct.
Anger>confrontation>accident>murder>cover up
That's my theory if I'm suspicious of a particular person. IMO
Right? The burning question. I think alot of us would see RL as maybe less of a POI if we know for sure SA was a component. Not that he couldn't do certain things (Viagra), but still would lessen the suspicions a bit, of course JMO. So many times LE does release the fact that people were SA during the assault, but here, on this case we hear nothing. Makes you really wonder about motive doesn't it? It he raped the girls you would think that would have been a component to the BOLO during the press conference to drive the point home just how dangerous a predator he is. So hmmmm. Hmmm. And hmmm.What's the.motive?
If there was a sexual assault I'd think the cops would have this town on high alert.
Not know what your children up to speech.
I don't think they have DNA or the DNA they do have does not match anyone.
So why kill 2 young girls?
to "rattle BG". it makes sense.Then why bother releasing it?
Except, we still don't have a time of death and they weren't found until around 12 noon on the 14th. He could just be innocently assuming along with the rest of us that the crime was over and done with by the time the police were called at around 530p on the 13th. But I could see where that statement could come back to haunt him in the future if...
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
There was mention of a witness who saw Abby's Snapchat photo and who walked the trail/bridge. It was posted as a woman IIRC with initials CE on one post and CME on another post. Something that she was quoted did not sound quite right IMO. She said that she went alone and saw "another couple" and a "man in black ". I thought it was strange because AFAIK one would only say "another couple" if you yourself were a couple. If you were there on your own, you would say "I saw a couple" not " I saw another couple" wouldn't you? If anyone remembers this being posted is this my suspicious mind or have I remembered it incorrectly or what? JMO
Curious, by 'accident' do you mean like he accidentally killed one of the girls then felt he had to murder the other?
Btw, If you'd rather not go into your theory any farther that's ok, I'll understand.
jmo
Curious, by 'accident' do you mean like he accidentally killed one of the girls then felt he had to murder the other?
Btw, If you'd rather not go into your theory any farther that's ok, I'll understand.
jmo
Have a quick question. trying to get my bearings.... does anyone remember the exact day BG's Bridge Photo was released to the public?
Thanks!
Was JW positively ruled out? I don't remember reading if he was or wasn't.
Wow, you are right. How could he know that crime was completed by 6:30pm. You think like a prosecutor!!! Nice catch
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
There was mention of a witness who saw Abby's Snapchat photo and who walked the trail/bridge. It was posted as a woman IIRC with initials CE on one post and CME on another post. Something that she was quoted did not sound quite right IMO. She said that she went alone and saw "another couple" and a "man in black ". I thought it was strange because AFAIK one would only say "another couple" if you yourself were a couple. If you were there on your own, you would say "I saw a couple" not " I saw another couple" wouldn't you? If anyone remembers this being posted is this my suspicious mind or have I remembered it incorrectly or what? JMO
I believe the photo was probably deliberately skewed and blurred. The person who was there would recognize himself. IMO it was deliberate strategy by LE to rattle BG.
Maybe-- but a fear of heights is not a guarantee in my opinion. I am deathly afraid of heights but only of certain heights. For example, I cannot ride roller coasters or go on zip-lines but I would be comfortable walking on that bridge.
How does an assumption most anyone would make, including us, suddenly become suspicious just because RL made it? IMO, this is an example of trying awfully hard to turn RL into the main suspect. Maybe there are reasons to be suspicious of him, but this ain't one of 'em, IMO.
http://www.insideedition.com/headli...rty-where-bodies-of-indiana-hikers-were-found
at 47 seconds...RL states " I was not home during the time all this was happening, I was in Lafayette, and I didn't get home until approx 6:30 in the evening....."
How does he know what time 'this was happening'
Yes, you are correct. The first posts here started about 8pm on the 15th. Way back in thread #1.Iirc 15th feb