I think he's right under their noses, too. A recent interview hit that home even more to me.
Originally, I didn't think he was clever. But as the weeks turn into months and not a lot of new info, I started wondering if he figured out ways to keep DNA minimal. DNA under fingernails is always the obvious one. Or he could have done something super gruesome such as cut off fingers so DNA couldn't be found. I do feel he was cautious about leaving as little DNA as possible.
These are good thoughts. I am trying to understand the tips that have come in (the ones the media has gotten hold of, anyway).
Help me understand.
There is evidenced being processed by the Indiana State crime lab and the FBI.
We do know there were searches at the Mears' property and on RL's property. I have learned so much for the Sleuthers here. The Mears' property is on the other side of the road for RL's property. Both properties have out buildings.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong, or if if there is something to be added about the SW to RL and why the media hasn't publicized one for the Mear's property?
With two properties involved, I do think it is likely the investigators were looking for trail evidence of the crime. By that, I mean evidence related, possibly directly, at both properties, but that is only MO.
We do know (from the media) evidence was taken from RL's property. Not so sure about the Mears' property.
Putting it all together, either the properties were searched because of the proximity to the crime scene, or evidence led the investigators there.
So, for the investigators to search a property, they need permission from the owners, or a SW wouldn't be needed.
They had to get a SW for RL's property, for sure.
What connects the properties? Why were both searched? Thanks, everyone. There are great minds here.