ilovepierre
One day, the lost will be found
Sorry, I've been out of the loop...who's BW, again?
Thank you Bently!
It's is obvious IMO that LE has no idea who BG is at this time. In other words there is nobody on their radar that they're hoping this sketch will confirm.
Re: the hat, I understand they don't want people to focus on the hat. But IMO the Oliver Twist hat is completely different from an Elmer Fudd as I referred to it in earlier threads. IMO they should have put the closest likeness of the hat, imo. Not dogging LE, they have their reasons unknown to us for doing what they do. I am grateful they have put something out. The expression of the sketch shows complacency to me, not sure if that's the best word.
I've got nothing else to add. Hugs and love to all of you out there following. I am soo frustrated beyond words, as we all are.
I did DNA test and the prediction of my eye color. It was wrong just saying.The "no blue eyes" undoubtedly refers to the results of a DNA screening process known as IrisPlex. It would confirm that DNA was retrieved from the crime scene, and that there is no DNA database match at this point, or an arrest would've been made.
From the Indiana State Police statement:
The person depicted in the composite sketch is described as a white male between 56 to 510, weighing 180 to 220 pounds,
http://content.govdelivery.com/bulletins/gd/INPOLICE-1aa8d2b
That's a pretty hefty build.
my first thought......now perhaps SKHere's a quirky thought on my part. What jumped out at me is that today's date is 7-17-17, and it reads exactly the same backwards and forwards. LE chose THIS date to release the sketch. Made me wonder if LE is trying to send a 'coded' message to the perp.
During the discussion here in earlier months it was pointed out repeatedly that the Iowa cousins, Lizzie and Lyric were abducted on 7-13-12. Reading those same numbers backwards exactly is 2-13-17, the same date that Abby and Libby were abducted. Many people questioned whether that could be more than just a very eerie coincidence. They wondered if it was 'proof' that the killer was the same for both sets of girls.
Seeing this date today with the same backward and forward sequence of numbers has made me wonder if LE believes there IS a connection too.
Then again, I may be completely wrong about this. Really could mean nothing at all. Thought it was worth a mention anyway...
wow awesome work.Does this help?![]()
Sorry, I've been out of the loop...who's BW, again?
Does this help?![]()
He exposed himself on a trail about 70 miles away. Here's Ticya's post about him.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...Delphi-13-Feb-2017-62&p=13505055#post13505055
Does anyone have a link to the full press release by LE about the sketch?
Doesn't sound like DNA to me either. From Bently's transcript:
"Q. In the release you mentioned some things exactly such as the hair color, can you talk about this at this time.
A. Basically, the hair color is a reddish brown. She was, the person was not clear on the color of the eyes, but sh.., the person said it was definitely not blue. She was very obvious..., the person was very obviously not blue eyes, but they did mention that they were not clear on what color it was."
What? I"m not following what you are implying...?OMG!, IMO!! Just watching the press conference, and they photo of Libby....look at it, and the sketch! Those dimples!
Just something to keep in mind about how somebody could acurately describe a person they bumped into on the bridge. More than likely the sketch artist asked for certain details , made several variations of renderings and the person then was asked to identify the one that looked the most like the person they saw that day. Then the artist would more than likely make subtle changes until the witness said oh thats him. More often than not I would think that the witness would have to see complete sketches in order for it to click as to what they actually saw. IMO people arn't just trained to describe every minute details of ones face, but when they see the different similarities in the sketches it clicks and they say oh thats the image of the person I saw that day. I'm sure its a very pain staking process and probablly frustrating at times, Its not just a simple what did he look like and artist draws it out in detail type thing. JMO
SNIP
One of the men described at the link physically resembles Bridge Guy.
You may discuss the article and the allegations therein. you may link and discuss any public record, including criminal, or MSM concerning the man, whose initials are BW.
YOU MAY NOT SLEUTH HIS SOCIAL MEDIA, FRIENDS, OR FAMILY MEMBERS.
Here is the article of interest:
http://fox59.com/2017/02/24/police-...eparate-flashing-incidents-along-monon-trail/
It was stated in the press conference that the sketch was a composite of information that came from various sources, not just eyewitnesses. It was not specifically stated that the "she" (or "the person") who said "no blue eyes" was actually an eyewitness. "She" could well have been a forensic science lab technician who wrote the report on the DNA test results.
Police say the person depicted in the composite sketch is described as a white male between 5’6” to 5’10”, weighing 180 to 220 pounds, with reddish brown hair. The eye color is unknown, ​but according to one witness, his eyes are not blue. Additionally, this sketch depicts a hat that may not be accurate.