As a former biology student and trying to follow margarita25's posts, maybe the eye color of blue was eliminated, therefore why it was stated at the presser and msm. I don't know I'm not a biochemist, I don't know if all things considered, if there is DNA available for testing all of this would already be available to LE. It's helpful to have a open mind when reading posts like these....
I agree. He has the saddest eyes. It makes me think he looks so ordinary that many people may have seen him without really seeing him.I was really upset by the sketch when I first saw it, because to me the person in it looks kind. I kept thinking the person looked familiar too, and it finally hit me - he reminds me of Winnie the Pooh. :scared:
I'm not crazy I promise. Excuse my pointless rambling.
The RL being the witness theory is making a lot of sense to me as well. I still feel really sorry for the man though.
IF LE had definitive DNA from the suspect wouldn't they have released an image similar to the ones on the Parabon website instead of utilizing a sketch artist to create the drawing provided the other day? Or is it possible that the drawing is a merged image of human recollection and computer analysis?
Has LE confirmed that the RSOs in Delphi and surrounding area have been ruled out? I'm unclear on this point.
JMO...
Catching up tonight and got so excited reading and watching the YouTube video upstream about Parabon.
If they can use Parabon to determine how a suspect looks by running DNA, they could do the same with DNA from unidentified Does! So many families could potentially find their missing loved ones and victims could finally have their names back....
JMO.
Are you able to share your opinion?oh i think there are people that know who it is :wink:
I wish national cable news outlets would dedicate more time to this case, especially since we now have a detailed sketch of the suspect. These channels bring in over a million viewers a day and I'm pretty sure that includes viewers who aren't getting their news online (for example: the elderly and technophobes). We need as many eyeballs in this country as possible looking at the pics and sketch (and hearing that voice - it's so distinct, someone knows that voice and knows it well). If BG is not local to Indiana then it's possible that a past contact of his hasn't been exposed to the story. We only need ONE PERSON from BG's past or present life to make that call.
Social media is powerful but isn't as wide-reaching in terms of demographics as television, IMO.
Source for cable news viewership:
http://variety.com/2017/tv/news/cable-news-ratings-cnn-fox-news-msnbc-q2-1202479416/
MsMtOlympus.
News like this case, with sketches, should be made 'world wide'.
Someone in his past may recognize him.
His back ground may not be from USA.
I agree. He has the saddest eyes. It makes me think he looks so ordinary that many people may have seen him without really seeing him.
Sent from my SM-T560NU using Tapatalk
Thanks or posting the super recogniser test in the last thread CoverMeCagny, Enjoyed doing it. got 11 out of 14
I agree. He has the saddest eyes. It makes me think he looks so ordinary that many people may have seen him without really seeing him.
Sent from my SM-T560NU using Tapatalk
( I thought he was more of a Randy quaid)I now know who the sketch reminds me of and maybe why a lot of people say the face looks familiar. Another mid-western man, BP.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/holly...heartbroken/story-TSlKiuDj6LQaxoRTxNwOPJ.html
Hey folks. Found a nice tool for radius searches from a youtube video. Google maps doesn't have a tool for this. Just enter a city/town and state, then click once on the map after searching where you want the radius to start. Right click or refresh to reset. This may help with Web-sleuthing in the future. It was built by a developer. Enjoy!
http://obeattie.github.io/gmaps-rad...=mi&lat=51.500358&lng=-0.125506&z=10&u=mi&r=5
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The amount of time that passed between the witness seeing BG and the release of the composite doesn't trouble me too much.
I discovered that I'd encountered a now incarcerated double murderer 25 years ago. My encounter with him was frightening (for then sheltered, shy me) and disturbing, but not violent, thankfully.
It did, however, leave enough of a impression that when I realized he was the same person convicted of two murders, I could easily recall his voice, his words, exactly what he wore that night, his facial features, his size, his skin tone. The encounter was traumatizing enough for my mind to file all those details away and recall them all those years later.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
*Full disclosure*
I know/knew people who came up with digital photography, in its early stages. Eastman Kodak company ca. 70's and into the 80's. "Knew" as in they are now deceased, "know" as in they are still with us, and I keep in touch with some of them.
The grainy/blurry images of BG scream to me "Selfie Cam!!!", but I could be wrong. I've worked in the optics field, on military-grade optics. My hunch is this great girl Libby used the selfie cam on her phone, to record BG, which might explain the poor quality, but again, she had the "presence of mind" to at least record this creeper on the bridge, that day.
Selfie cams are of a poorer quality than the cam most-used on a Smart or I-Phone, the resolution just isn't there.
Myself and others have theorized from early on that she took the video over her shoulder (thank our lucky stars), and MOO is she was trying to make it appear that she was just screwing around on her phone, looking at it, straight on to the screen.
JMO, as always...