kai
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2009
- Messages
- 2,960
- Reaction score
- 2,337
I am seeing an actual mugshot too, and was wondering who it is also. ?That is the new sketch released by LE.
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
I am seeing an actual mugshot too, and was wondering who it is also. ?That is the new sketch released by LE.
Where? Can you put in a pointer?I am seeing an actual mugshot too, and was wondering who it is also. ?
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Some people have done some side by sides and there have been many images posted of RL,so not sure which mugshot you are referring to.Reply with quote or offer thread and post numberI am seeing an actual mugshot too, and was wondering who it is also. ?
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Here is a screenshot if I can do it right. LolUnfortunately I am viewing it on Tapatalk and there isn't a post number by it. It is definitely not the sketch that was released or RL. It must be a photo of someone posted up thread that maybe Tapatalk has decided to feature on the thread. Jmo.
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
I'm not familiar with that photo or tapadatalk sorry.Here is a screenshot if I can do it right. Lol
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
I have noticed that when I come to this site,that I start seeing ads for new crate motors from summit racing which I have been pricing on the summit site so maybe some kind of tracker or something from previous searches.I'm not familiar with that photo or tapadatalk sorry.
Boy, that's misleading. It even looks like it was posted under a user's name.That's just a banner ad for mugshots.com. Not related.
I agree Imno there was some important interviews and other stuff in there IMO.It wasn't his views I was trying to get out there.It was his interview with Tobe.He did a video before that where Tobe actually did an interview with MS on the phone.I think any interview with LE is important,sometimes you just have to look past the other stuff I guess.
That guy in the photo looks like LE or FD with his epaulettes. I've not seen it before.I'm not familiar with that photo or tapadatalk sorry.
Sorry for trimming down your post I hope that's ok. I agree that anyone *as long as they are your friend* can see where you are. When they introduced this feature the default setting was that it was disabled. You are in "ghost" mode until you turn it on.
The other thing about snapchat is that you can't just present yourself as another person. You have to take a new photo or new video. You can't upload and shoot out pictures that you find on the internet. The only way that BG could present himself as a teenage boy or anyone else would be to have that person near him, take their picture or have them take a video and let him send it as his own.
The program is almost the opposite of instagram. Instagram you can search around and look at strangers photos (as long as their accounts are public). Your pictures are meant to be seen as if you are posting to your own personal online photo book. Most people curate their photos to present a very specific image. Snapchat is fleeting and it's only for your friends.
It still seems too far fetched for me and just too much work - unless BG had a willing teenager as an accomplice who was actively and knowingly pretending to be the person Abby and Libby thought he was OR... BG had a teenager who left their phone around, unlocked, he knew how to use the program and BG looked through their friends posts. And then that requires that Abby or Libby to be friends with this teenager, have sent a snap in the last 24 hours that wasn't already opened (and therefor disappeared) and then BG could hightail it over to the location with minimal preparation. This then means that the teenager, whos account it was, can see that the images were opened and no longer can see them for them self. If that happened to me I'd be asking my husband (or who ever was around my phone) who was checking my snapchat.
I don't know, moo.
-SSDGM-
Despite my cringing when I see Libby and Abby's murders referred to as "the Snapchat murders" since authorities have not linked the killings to the girls' use of the app, this is an interesting LE discussion of potential danger of Snapchat Map:
https://www.facebook.com/SaveTheNextGirl/posts/1599814796710041
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Anyone who harms a child in any manner should have no freedoms at all.I have my opinions of what should be done to them but we are supposedly a civilized society.Trackers should be placed in these animals while they are on the inside if they have even the slightest chance of parole.They should also be tattooed on the forehead with big red letters "RSO"
I wonder why so many believe there is a connection to two separate crimes? The only way these murder's are connected is that two young girls were murdered together. It's tragic, it's sad, but is it a solid link? I'd like to think if there has been a connection made, LE would have 'breaking news' about that connection. This would be leading story event. It would need to be confirmed to the communities where both happened and it hasn't been confirmed by anyone of authority in either case.
What's more terrifying; one killer? Or two killers with some need to kill young girls?
But wouldn't holding back information also be tempered with informing the public since this is a public safety issue? These guys work for US and part of that job is keeping the public informed about safety in their communities.....
I'm sure you didn't mean BG stands for Bill Gates did you?
Take any two unconnected events and if you look hard enough you'll find stuff they have in common. The Iowa case and this one may well turn out to be related, but I'd be amazed if the dates being the same backwards or the sites both having 'Bridge' in the name were anything more than coincidences. JMO obviously.