Good idea
Lets reverse the points.
DN resembles the police sketch but looks like a younger person than the police sketch.
No DNA match to the scene
He doesn't have and wouldn't have worn a jacket like BG is wearing (style is too farmer, too old)
Opportunty:
Getting to Delphi is1:20 minutes from the Camby area where DN was living homeless
He had no transportation, car or motorcycle.
He has no reported connections to Delphi or reason to go there.
He was at an ultrasound with his wife at 2:45 on 2/13, the time the crime started more than an hour away,
Motive:
He has no reason to murder two teens, he never killed before, his crimes don't indicate an escalation to murder. He gets angry, threatens, commits assault and sexually motivated publec exposure crimes -- but he had never combined the two. He had threatened to kill people and people were afraid of him, but again this was within a predicatble range, not expected to escalate. We dont know how they were killed -- so if had means is not knowable.
Means:
As a felon he could not have weapons legally.
He did not have gun at the time, he sold his shotgun to comply with the law.
He did have a hatchet and used it mainly for camping, although he did also use it to threaten people but these threats were within a predictable range of outburst and not necessarily expected to escalate to murder.
Can't think of any more points -- I wonder if he never hitchhikes - haven't seen that question asked.
Fair points, but not all 100% accepted as fact though, as the ultrasound debate rages on.
What better alibi could you have than ian a medical office with a scheduled appointment? Should prosecutors try and make a predominantly circumstantial case against him one day, he'll be kicking himself for not taking pictures or doing something noteworthy that day. Her inability to remember, especially in interviews, could become very damaging.
Something like Google Timeline might be a useful tool in this sort of thing, rather than an oppresive big brother conspiracy to be worried a out. Again, it would only prove that the phone went to the ultrasound, but reasonable doubt would come into play.
If there was something concrete to clear him, then the means and motive parts could be spot on.