Oregonmama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2012
- Messages
- 7,761
- Reaction score
- 38,314
Anyone know when the FBI joined the investigation? How soon after the girls were discovered?
Was it pretty much immediately?
It was within a few days
Anyone know when the FBI joined the investigation? How soon after the girls were discovered?
Was it pretty much immediately?
I wondered some of the same things. It probably took them time to listen to all the audio, discuss with speech experts to decipher which words would be best to release that capture his normal speaking voice. I would guess there is more audio of him speaking however it is probably too traumatic to release to the public. They only get one chance to release audio to get the most impact and exposure. These are reasons why I think it took so long. If the released audio doesn't lead to any good tips I could envision them releasing more audio even though it might be more traumatic. I can't imagine what other audio might be heard and I guarantee it isn't pretty.I'm new here and to analyzing things like this never have before. I like the way you think and especially the user name.
I from the start have had this almost identical theory. Being new it was skewed a little by believing that most had been here longer and might have a better understanding.
One thing being new I don't understand... If you want help solving a puzzle you gotta put all the pieces on the board right?? Or aleast have the box as a reference so to say?
Who is it that benefits from them holding not only the info we just got for say almost a week.. But future clues that are sure to come out?
Because my mind set is the sooner the better.. Just on the statement that . Memory's fade.
Also I'm sure this guy didn't stop in a store and buy a pack of "down the hill" not very good keywords in my mind to appeal to the public about.
Any body feel free to explain please I just can't analyze it any other way as being positive.
Why wait?!?
His opinion needs to be respected and the man's layered clothing on a warm day could also support he is a drifter. At the same time, the area does not appear to be a haven for drifters nor does it appear to be near any travel routes (off an interstate, by a truck stop) etc.
He could be from say, a three country area of the hiking trail. Delays in identifying him might be because the photo quality is poor and he is so, well, plain. In short, that three county area, there are thousands of 40 to 55 year old middle aged white males in that part of Indiana with apparently central Indiana accents and who wear farm or work clothes on a daily basis with little regard to what styles are trendy.
I'm wondering if it was because of the nature of the crime scene or because they had the digital evidence and they were seeking experts. It seemed the FBI agent today mentioned being there working alongside them from nearly the beginning.Did the FBI get involvement with the case because local authorities asked for their help? I can't seem to find info on that.
Anyone know when the FBI joined the investigation? How soon after the girls were discovered?
Was it pretty much immediately?
Dogface, do you have any ideas on what brand/type of shoes he is wearing? TIA
I don't understand why they wouldn't have called 911 if they had at least one working phone?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Anyone know when the FBI joined the investigation? How soon after the girls were discovered?
Was it pretty much immediately?
Did the FBI get involvement with the case because local authorities asked for their help? I can't seem to find info on that.
I don't understand why they wouldn't have called 911 if they had at least one working phone?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I recall that when they discovered them the local media said the "Crime Scene Processing Team" (or some fancy name) from the Indianapolis FBI Field Office was asked to help with processing the crime scene. But that was early in the case and it may have been not the real reason.
Gonna disregard the "not local" opinion for now.
Indeed. Authorities leaving out details to the public is not uncommon and is procedural. Hopefully this doesnt distract into any farfetch ideas of the authorities hiding something immorally.I think they explained the reasons for withholding a lot of the details/video/audio very well in the press conference. It's a good way to weed out tips that are not useful. Someone overhears some dude in a bar say that they hit someone on the head. The listener calls it in but the police know that's not what happened. So they bin the tip and move on. The other reason of course is to avoid the false-confession whackjobs that always seem to show up in cases like this.