SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 30,599
- Reaction score
- 189,153
That statement has bothered me from the get go. I have to wonder if Winkleman is simply running with what SA and the parents have told him. The whole banging on the glass may even ring hollow to him but technically he's obligated to support his clients' story. Since KW is also a lawyer she and Winkleman may struggle a bit over how they proceed. JMO though.
Video shows girl's final moments with grandfather before cruise ship death
Yes. And I imagine that Ortiz is going to say similar in the negligent homicide trial.
A defense lawyer has to run with something for their defense - and it is generally what their client has agreed to, the story their client told them. In the same manner that a litigation lawyer has to run with something in their lawsuit.
Either scenario sound pretty out there - likely incredible to both Ortiz and Winkleman - when there are floor to ceiling windows. 'Chloe wanted to bang on the glass'. 'Chloe wanted to look at the view'.
They are probably thinking "What???"
Last edited: