My point is that if the parents are really "only suing to protect other children and families" then why would they take the money from the RCCL rather than go to court and have the ruling be that whatever money they would have gotten be used to improve the safety of windows on the boats? And there is no Chloe's rule but as I have stated before, drinking when you are watching children that small is wrong in my opinion. I don't care if you are in the safety of your own home, anything could go wrong and if you drink with small children Chloe's age you are a bad parent. Parenting means you don't get to have the same life you did before you had kids. I had three kids and when they will little I didn't drink for 12 years. I can't fathom the idea that a decent parent would drink anything when watching a baby, a toddler or a child under 12 years old.
So no, I don't think it's a fun family trip for parents to get drunk when they are out with their children. I think this kind of behavior has gotten out of control in the US and Europe and it's shocking to me that mothers especially think this is OK.
How many times has alcohol played a contributing role in something like this? It's dangerous and wrong.
The reason I say enforce it on the Cruise is that it's well known that cruises push alcohol like crazy. Setting up a 'family fun" cruise and then pushing alcohol is equally wrong on the part of RCCL.
Here is an article about the epidemic of mothers of small children drinking.
Why mommy drinks: The scary truth about #WineMom