Does this story connect to the mystery witness who heard a scream at 4:30 AM?
http://www.wbiw.com/local/archives/2009/02/stories_differ_greatly_in_case.php
http://www.wbiw.com/local/archives/2009/02/stories_differ_greatly_in_case.php
Good points. That is certainly a real possibility. What makes LS's case slightly different in my opinion is that one of the POIs has claimed "memory loss" and has refused to talk to her parents and LE (from what I understood). That is not the behavior of someone who has nothing to hide and wants to help.
He has not talked with her parents but he talked with LE about a week after she disappeared. And it's been reported that he let them search his car and cell phone.
IMO it would be much easier to believe if, from the get go, they simply said he blacked out (as from drinking and drugs) rather than calling it amnesia or memory loss. However, it could be entirely true that he suffers amnesia from the punch. If innocent, what a nebulous place for him to be in his head. :sick:
Hi, where did you see that he talked to LE? Have a link? My understanding is that he met in the presence of his lawyer with LE to give a DNA sample. That does not mean he talked to LE really.
Does this story connect to the mystery witness who heard a scream at 4:30 AM?
http://www.wbiw.com/local/archives/2009/02/stories_differ_greatly_in_case.php
Hi, where did you see that he talked to LE? Have a link? My understanding is that he met in the presence of his lawyer with LE to give a DNA sample. That does not mean he talked to LE really.
Good post. I also think it is just as likely, perhaps even more so, that she was picked up by someone who (1) parties in the same larger social circle; (2) lives or hangs out in the general vicinity; (3) works at Sports, Smallwood, or a nearby business.
Fair call. The last I recall reading was that Salzmann would not in fact confirm whether CR submitted DNA even tho it was widely reported that he had. You'd think if CR had it would be in his favor to acknowledge and confirm. Sooo I figured if he didn't give DNA at police station they talked.
I think it was the other way around. Salzmann confirmed that he gave DNA. But I have never seen that he agreed to talk to the police and talked to them. And the question remains, if so, why? Why not talk to the police? Why not talk to the parents of LS? Even in the presence of his lawyer.
Franklin is indeed 'Tallboy', though I don't know how or if that story is connected.
I still get the two confused, but Road Dog is the homeless man in a wheelchair who was found behind the Steakhouse (Ponderosa?).Road Dog was Franklin Lee Crawford and he couldn't walk. Tallboy apparently could
I think it was the other way around. Salzmann confirmed that he gave DNA. But I have never seen that he agreed to talk to the police and talked to them. And the question remains, if so, why? Why not talk to the police? Why not talk to the parents of LS? Even in the presence of his lawyer.
I would like to throw out another theory. MB has now said that LS left and he went upstairs. I assume to go to bed.
What if she did go to JR's and left as he said. He watches her walk to the corner and goes back into his apt.
CR gets up and realizes LS is gone. MB has gone to his room so he would not know if CR left. So, CR goes looking for her. He sees her walking to the corner. There is an ally behind the dr's office that leads to the gravel area. He either follows her or calls out for her and she goes back to the area behind 5 North. JR has gone back in his apt so he would not see or hear CR.
Now the following:
1). CR wants her to come back; she doesn't want to; scuffle happens, she drops her key card (JR said she had it with her)
2). Could this be the place the dog lost her scent.
3). Would this be about the time the homeless man heard a scream.
Now the million dollar question. If all of this could have happened, how did he get her out of there? Wanted to hear why or why not this could or could not happen.
This could answer why some want to know how JR could cover for CR. He would not be because he didn't know that it happened.
Could also answer why CR is not talking to anyone except attorney.
I know for a fact that certain people like to insert themselves, sometimes even telling outright lies, into situations of high drama, such as those involving crimes, disappearances, deaths. I'm sure psychologists can explain why but I see it as a way to get attention and to participate from a place of authority especially if one has information LE does not have. This is what I believe happened with the homeless person who said he heard her scream.
Given her reported condition I don't think Lauren could scream loud enough for someone to hear her several blocks away. And as someone asked a long time ago, "How does a homeless person know what time it is, does he wear a watch?" My answer is he knows because the time of her last sighting was reported as 4:30. It's that simple.
I would like to throw out another theory. MB has now said that LS left and he went upstairs. I assume to go to bed.
What if she did go to JR's and left as he said. He watches her walk to the corner and goes back into his apt.
CR gets up and realizes LS is gone. MB has gone to his room so he would not know if CR left. So, CR goes looking for her. He sees her walking to the corner. There is an ally behind the dr's office that leads to the gravel area. He either follows her or calls out for her and she goes back to the area behind 5 North. JR has gone back in his apt so he would not see or hear CR.
Now the following:
1). CR wants her to come back; she doesn't want to; scuffle happens, she drops her key card (JR said she had it with her)
2). Could this be the place the dog lost her scent.
3). Would this be about the time the homeless man heard a scream.
Now the million dollar question. If all of this could have happened, how did he get her out of there? Wanted to hear why or why not this could or could not happen.
This could answer why some want to know how JR could cover for CR. He would not be because he didn't know that it happened.
Could also answer why CR is not talking to anyone except attorney.
I may doubt his account as well. However, we can't confirm anything because Franklin Crawford died on 10 June, 2011.
I know for a fact that certain people like to insert themselves, sometimes even telling outright lies, into situations of high drama, such as those involving crimes, disappearances, deaths. I'm sure psychologists can explain why but I see it as a way to get attention and to participate from a place of authority especially if one has information LE does not have. This is what I believe happened with the homeless person who said he heard her scream.
Given her reported condition I don't think Lauren could scream loud enough for someone to hear her several blocks away. And as someone asked a long time ago, "How does a homeless person know what time it is, does he wear a watch?" My answer is he knows because the time of her last sighting was reported as 4:30. It's that simple.
I feel uncomfortable whenever talking about CJ or a LE conspiracy.It is impossible to know whether the scream really happened or not, and we have only CJ's word that Tallboy wore a watch. See CJ's post at Thursday, August 4, 2011: 4:03 pm at this link:
http://www.heraldtimesonline.com/stories/comments/cmt.php?cmtus=chickjustin