Spellbound
falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2013
- Messages
- 19,026
- Reaction score
- 37,304
Throwing this in here just so it is in our records. He apparently had his license suspended previously (@1999) fo 10 years, and appealed
Paul Etter v. State
IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
PAUL ETTER, ) ) Appellant-Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) No. 79A05-9811-PC-571 ) STATE OF INDIANA, ) ) Appellee-Respondent. )
APPEAL FROM THE TIPPECANOE COUNTY COURT
The Honorable Gregory J. Donat, Judge
Cause No. 79E01-9403-CF-115
Paul Etter appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Etter raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as: whether the post-conviction court erred by denying his petition.
We affirm.
The Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles ("BMV") suspended Etter's driving privileges for ten years on May 22, 1992 because it determined he was an habitual traffic violator.
Continued at link above
Paul Etter v. State
IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
PAUL ETTER, ) ) Appellant-Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) No. 79A05-9811-PC-571 ) STATE OF INDIANA, ) ) Appellee-Respondent. )
APPEAL FROM THE TIPPECANOE COUNTY COURT
The Honorable Gregory J. Donat, Judge
Cause No. 79E01-9403-CF-115
Paul Etter appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Etter raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as: whether the post-conviction court erred by denying his petition.
We affirm.
The Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles ("BMV") suspended Etter's driving privileges for ten years on May 22, 1992 because it determined he was an habitual traffic violator.
Continued at link above