Linda7NJ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2005
- Messages
- 32,112
- Reaction score
- 8,286
EWWWW!!! uke: Please tell me you don't want to investigate JA too. It could get deep. :what:
GAK! Heck no! Neva Jodi's!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
EWWWW!!! uke: Please tell me you don't want to investigate JA too. It could get deep. :what:
Actually I'm disappointed in most everyone associated with this trial. Add to that, IMO, JA is overcharged.
Actually I'm disappointed in most everyone associated with this trial. Add to that, IMO, JA is overcharged.
The third gas can I get. It's critical in her getting through Arizona without a stop, IIRC. The finger injury is another thing altogether. I guess she'd rather try and pin it on Travis than admit it happened during the murder when she was fogified.
... Part of me wishes I could sniff that finger of his to find out what's so damn olfactory great about it!
Roflmao!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hey, Steely, I just pushed your buttons! I never knew they really worked!
Jod's fingers have certainly suffered their share of relatively minor trauma. Did you notice in the police interview how she really perked up when the detective wanted to see her finger. She loved, loved showing him her ow-ee. I think she was so wrapped up in it she forgot why she was there.
I have no doubts that these are signals. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCU6sOBYG4I
Actually I'm disappointed in most everyone associated with this trial. Add to that, IMO, JA is overcharged.
I can't stand Juan (professionally in this case) and will say so until the cows come home. Doesn't mean I'd ever want to prosecute this case. There's plenty of peeps here who have strong feelings about counsel that have no interest or ability to try the case - myself included. My opinion is just unpopular. I'm used to it
What would you like to see when trying to prove that she is a lying, manipulative, psychopath? Should he talk to her like Mr. Rogers?
BBM: Really? What are your thoughts on this? If you feel comfortable sharing your reasonings, I would love to hear it.
IMO-JA sunk her own ship when she took the stand. She is at fault for her own demise. I doubt either one of her attorney's wanted her to take the stand. I think the investigation was amazing. I'm also thinking there is much more to come from the prosecution.
What more needs to come? She’s guilty. She admits she killed him and by killed him I mean she admits she over killed him. And I believe she should be sentenced accordingly but to make a grandstand death penalty case out of this obsessive woman scorned case just turned the whole thing into a giant circus.
Actually I'm disappointed in most everyone associated with this trial. Add to that, IMO, JA is overcharged.
What more needs to come? Shes guilty. She admits she killed him and by killed him I mean she admits she over killed him. And I believe she should be sentenced accordingly but to make a grandstand death penalty case out of this obsessive woman scorned case just turned the whole thing into a giant circus.
She intended to kill him. She didn't stop after the shot or after stabbing him once or twice. She kept on and kept changing ways of killing him (gun to knife or knife to gun, whatever) until he was dead. It fits the legal definition of murder one-which is a fact, not an opinion.You said she was overcharged. Now you say she is guilty of first degree murder. Then, she is not overcharged. Those are the charges. JA is not guilty of 2nd degree murder, this was premeditated. JMO
I have been scorned, but haven't stabbed someone 27 times, sliced them from ear to ear, almost decapitating them, then shot them in the head. That's cruel and heinous. Those are the charges.
I still think she showered over his body.
what do you think she should be charged with? loitering? 2nd degree murder? nothing? manslaughter?