Italy - Sailing yacht sank off Italian coast, 15 rescued, 7 missing, 19 August 2024

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Started out sunny and warm with no warning about a storm coming in until we could actually see it coming at us very quickly. My very pregnant daughter and younger daughter was with us. I immediately sent them down into the cabin and locked all hatches. Pulled the anchor and lowered the keel. We tried to beat the storm to the inlet for safe harbor but that did not happen. We had anchored to fish a little bit. Now I'm so glad it was anchored so that we had time to walk about the sailboat and prepare for a storm. We tried to motor in and the boat was on it's side the entire time, I was hanging onto the lifelines to stay on the boat. Steering toward the inlet. The storm overran us and it was a real wild ride for a while. My daughters were screaming because the water was over the windows. We couldn't cut the engine because water would have came over the back of sailboat and swamp us. We made it into the inlet and then tried to stick it on a sandbar so that we would not collide with people's docks. Missed it by inches.
That is an amazing story @lonetraveler . Thank you SO much for sharing. It is compelling how similar the experience might have been on the Bayesian.

The difference being that you are here to tell your story because you may have done things differently in response to the downburst. And of course your event was during daylight and you could see the approaching storm; the Bayesian's event was during the dark of night, @3:50am and the watchman likely could not easily see the thunderstorm marching towards them.

I wonder if your downburst happened while you and your family were asleep, would you have been able to do all you did in time to save your lives and yacht (drop keel, pull up anchor, close hatches, start engines, steer to inlet)?

I also wonder - since a few of us have tried to no avail to find historical 19-8 data that shows the Bayesian's downburst origin storm could have been predicted by radar or weather alerts - if you had any electronic forewarning?

Lastly, could you estimate the angle your yacht was heeled at while you motored and steered towards the inlet? I ask because we have learned that the Bayesian could not return to upright if it heeled more than 45° (vanishing angle). So many here suspect that design (flaw?) played a role in her demise as she faced a fierce downburst.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
He's trying to put the tall mast at fault but without the keel down and the anchor up and hatches closed there was no way for the boat to not sink.

This goes in part why I think the vessel was unseaworthy notwithstanding that it was built to code. It's both expected and allowed for the keel to be up while the anchor is down as well as hatches being open. They didn't have to have the keel down until they were 60 miles away from port. As a matter of practical use as well as providing more comfort to HNW passengers the vessel is very vulnerable to suddenly capsizing...I also take issue with how glassy the passenger areas were, which further created a hazard when disaster struck and the passenger stairway seemed poorly designed to function during a disaster too. The regulations should change so that a vessel behaving in a predictable way can't sink in minutes and kill everyone in the passenger compartment. It sounds like some mistakes were made like by the engineer, but it shouldn't result in near-instant death as a vessel should have some room for error. I'd expect something more like this with a superyacht taking hours to sink when there's bad weather and crew mistakes:
There was this relative tiny yacht that was attacked by orcas and they had over an hour to escape:
 
You would think so. He should have been ordering the crew to do the things that needed to be done. I'm thinking that if the hatches were closed as claimed, the boat would not be on the bottom of the water.

But it sounds like the watchman was 'manually' closing windows and hatches. Of course that is my interpretation.

well wouldn't it be easy to check if the hatches are closed? he'd be a fool to lie about something that can and will be
checked by diving down or when they recover the boat

Non-mariner question from me: Regarding checking to see if hatches are closed - if investigators find them open, either investigating on the seabed or when the pull the boat up, could that be because of damage during the incident?
In other words, are hatches designed to be strong enough to stay closed at water pressure of 50m under the sea and being pulled/tugged to be brought up to sea level?
 
Last edited:
And then there are the engine room vents that experts (and us sleuthers here) have opined may have been open.

I thought the engine room was in the stern from Bayesian deck diagrams we've reviewed here. And if heavy water ingress occurred through the vents, that might explain why the Bayesian was seen with its bow raised (per the captain on the nearby schooner) and perhaps why the six passengers died on the lower deck.

But the Engineer's comments posted here today, make it sound like the engine room was not in the stern. Of course I may be missing something. Regardless, I still think the engine vents were key.

IMO.
Engine room was in the stern.
I've also been wondering for a while now which crew member sleeps in the bed behind the Engine room - you can see a green bed in the stern like the crew accommodation in the bow.
@lonetraveler, related question for you regarding that you saw the captain's cabin was center placed - where did you find that info?
Thank you everyone
1725258093407.png
 
I wonder if the fact that the Bayesian was designed by an Italian firm will have any effect on the investigation on the disaster.

Built in 2008 by Perini Navi in Viareggio, Italy. And retrofitted in 2020.


Interesting, they went bankrupt, so, no longer a company. Probably no blow back from the manufacturer.

 
Bow first states to me that the anchor was off the bow part of the boat. JMO
Anchor is always off the bow. (Anchor off stern will sink).
Typically the bow will always be pointing into the wind (notice any area with boats at anchor or moored, they are all pointing same direction.
Boats will spin around anchor as wind changes direction. If there’s some sort of “tornado” perhaps wind speed is faster and direction changes faster ship changes direction in water with sea surges/waves hitting side of ship rather than bow helping in tipping it? (How the dragging anchor impacts ??)

Other ships in area, not impacted by the
 
I've also been wondering for a while now which crew member sleeps in the bed behind the Engine room - you can see a green bed in the stern like the crew accommodation in the bow.
RS&BBM
Excellent observation, @ItalyReader. I have to wonder if that was the yacht's chef, Recaldo Thomas, a Canadian citizen working in Antigua. He perished as well, although found the next day floating near the yacht. Without knowing of course, he could have been trapped in the stern or injured from the rolls of the yacht and unable to escape.
IMO
 
Not that this should be a surprise but the first autopsies have been done, which the results are the death was a result of drowning:
 
Anchor is always off the bow. (Anchor off stern will sink).
Typically the bow will always be pointing into the wind (notice any area with boats at anchor or moored, they are all pointing same direction.
Boats will spin around anchor as wind changes direction. If there’s some sort of “tornado” perhaps wind speed is faster and direction changes faster ship changes direction in water with sea surges/waves hitting side of ship rather than bow helping in tipping it? (How the dragging anchor impacts ??)

Other ships in area, not impacted by the
You are correct. I was answering a post above about where the anchor would be.
 
That is an amazing story @lonetraveler . Thank you SO much for sharing. It is compelling how similar the experience might have been on the Bayesian.

The difference being that you are here to tell your story because you may have done things differently in response to the downburst. And of course your event was during daylight and you could see the approaching storm; the Bayesian's event was during the dark of night, @3:50am and the watchman likely could not easily see the thunderstorm marching towards them.

I wonder if your downburst happened while you and your family were asleep, would you have been able to do all you did in time to save your lives and yacht (drop keel, pull up anchor, close hatches, start engines, steer to inlet)?

I also wonder - since a few of us have tried to no avail to find historical 19-8 data that shows the Bayesian's downburst origin storm could have been predicted by radar or weather alerts - if you had any electronic forewarning?

Lastly, could you estimate the angle your yacht was heeled at while you motored and steered towards the inlet? I ask because we have learned that the Bayesian could not return to upright if it heeled more than 45° (vanishing angle). So many here suspect that design (flaw?) played a role in her demise as she faced a fierce downburst.

Thank you.
We were fortunate that the storm did not hit during the night. It would have been extremely hard to prepare for the storm quickly in the dark. My sailboat heeled about 45 degrees, the tip of the mast hit the water and we were praying it would not hit the bottom or it probably would break the mast. Thankful that the weight of the keel helped it to pop back up.
 
If anyone could find a link to this it would be helpful to compare with the other Bayesian plans we’ve seen.
Thank you!

The Bayesian had a traditional aft cockpit and a fully enclosable forward cockpit. Two different spots from which it could be controlled.

It is interesting that it was the only yacht from the 10 yachts of its class (56 metres) built by that builder that had a single mast. The others had two masts. I wonder how that affected the stability of a boat that size.



Also, the total crew area was 107 sq metres/1,152 sq ft.

 
Last edited:
Non-mariner question from me: Regarding checking to see if hatches are closed - if investigators find them open, either investigating on the seabed or when the pull the boat up, could that be because of damage during the incident?
In other words, are hatches designed to be strong enough to stay closed at water pressure of 50m under the sea and being pulled/tugged to be brought up to sea level?

yeah that question was floating around in my brain too
 
Hey Everyone,
Isn't it nice that you no longer have to deal with the obnoxious ads on Websleuths. You also don't have to deal with me whining asking for donations for the server. Websleuths is so much better now and that is because of our partnership with Othram. We are now free of my whining and those horrid ads.
If you like the fact that we are ad-free then please consider making a monthly donation to DNA Solves.com CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR A MONTHLY DONATION TO DNA SOLVES
By subscribing and making a monthly donation, you will be helping the families finally get the answers they deserve.
The amazing people at DNA Solves/Othram care deeply about finding the families of the unidentified.
Even 5 dollars a month would go a long way to finding the families of the unidentified.
Please do not discuss this on this thread. CLICK HERE if you would like to discuss further or have any questions.
Thank you,
Tricia Griffith
Manager/Websleuths.com
 
The Bayesian had a traditional aft cockpit and a fully enclosable forward cockpit. Two different spots from which it could be controlled.

It is interesting that it was the only yacht from the 10 yachts of its class (56 metres) built by that builder that had a single mast. The others had two masts. I wonder how that affected the stability of a boat that size.



Also, the total crew area was 107 sq metres/1,152 sq ft.


What I'm looking for is a diagram/plan which shows the captain's cabin. I have read that it is typically next to or near the cockpit. I think it's odd that the captain's cabin location has not been identified either in press or in any of the diagrams we've found. I've shared this one multiple times but for relevancy I'll put it again here - it shows the same diagrams which are in your first link above. BAYESIAN Yacht Layout / General Arrangement Plans (ex. Salute) - Perini Navi Yachts

Unless he was in the crew area. But I don't think so. There appear to be beds for 8-9 people in the aft crew area, and another in the stern area, as someone noted perhaps for the cook.

If the captain had a cabin next to the cockpit/controls, why isn't that indicated on the plans?

My thought is that it isn't on the plans. I don't know why.

Also, if the pilot house is in the center as indicated from a photo I believe by @lonetraveler then why is wikipedia saying instead the cockpits are forward and aft, not center?

A diagram showing captain's cabin might help clarify all this.
 
Also, if the pilot house is in the center as indicated from a photo I believe by @lonetraveler then why is wikipedia saying instead the cockpits are forward and aft, not center?

Wiki is saying that because that is what is stated in the spec provided by Superyacht Times. All of Wiki's statements are clearly referenced.

The "forward" cockpit would be the one in the centre. Sailing yachts traditionally (and usually) are steered from the rear of the yacht, so Bayesian also has a cockpit at the rear.

I personally believe that the Captain's bunk is with the crew, in the crew quarters. It is the owner's quarters that are in the middle of the yacht. On many vessels the Captain is the owner, but not on this one, not on this trip.


The deck layout presents a very tasteful innovation, coming from the earlier Liberty 52-metre ketch: a 60m2 fore cockpit, in addition to the traditional aft cockpit.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
186
Guests online
240
Total visitors
426

Forum statistics

Threads
608,856
Messages
18,246,439
Members
234,469
Latest member
InvisibleLove
Back
Top