eileenhawkeye
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2010
- Messages
- 8,755
- Reaction score
- 132
This is just my opinion....but I'd think it would be quicker to match two samples then to match one against a whole system. I would think that in the cases where they have DNA they would know within a 2 week, maybe a month at most window. In cases where there is no DNA it might take more investigative work/ more time to find evidence to tie JLM to the case.
For me though, the more time that goes by, if we hear nothing, it will increase my belief that they are trying to keep everything close to the vest to help strengthen LE's case(s) against JLM. And to me it would indicate that they did indeed find some startling, perhaps explosive evidence against JLM.
Could it be that LE would really really like to have his cases tried in Cville, and not asked to be moved based on too much bias. And if they where to release what they have learned it would virtually confirm in everyone's mind his absolute guilt...given his lawyer grounds to ask for change of venue....I dunno just some thoughts.
I just can't imagine, (and I know its still too early), that if his lawyer knew that there was no forensic link btw certain other cases, how he wouldn't want to announce that info ASAP...as I would think it could only help his client...and maybe I'm wrong but I don't think LE would have any authority to ban him from such an announcement.
I do wonder, what the requirements are for LE to share those results with his lawyer? Are they required to? Or only if/when they press charges?
Additionally can anyone think of a good reason why if LE had established there were no links btw certain cases they would not want to announce it to the public? I'd think if they could show that there was no DNA match even LE would want to announce that...as I'm sure letting a serial rapist/murderer get away with so much for so long doesn't make them look good.
They do not have DNA in most of these cases. They might not have anything to show he did or did not do it. If there is no forensic evidence from the killer, then what? The only thing left is proof that he was somewhere else that day.
I am skeptical that LE is even investigating a link for most of the cases posted here...A lot of them haven't even been brought up in the media. I doubt they are launching some huge investigation w/o some sort of established link.