kaki
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2008
- Messages
- 848
- Reaction score
- 1
I don't think it existed--it is another red herring, it allows her to say she was bloody when she came to, she wasn't, she showered or washed up or something at Travis'. If she admits to this or even to not being bloody when she came to, it means she will have to acknowledge she showered etc., which doesn't really support her "fog" claim. How can you be in a fog and shower off the blood, and basically wipe the place of prints and blood. Not really "in a fog" behavior. So she has to say she was bloody, and washed off with water. Another lie from a lying liar.
Exactly. That case of water seems to have only one purpose: to cleanse blood off herself after murdering Travis. She never mentions having it in the passenger compartment where she would drink it, she doesn't mention having it for a roadside emergency, and by storing it in the trunk with the gas cans, it would be hot and taste like gas. Therefore, IF the water existed, does it go to premeditation as it's purpose is to wash off the blood? In essence, that is what she is saying.
MOO
I'm sure I'm the last person in the English-speaking world to ask this, so I apologize in advance. But what is Travis referring to in the following text messages to JA? TIA
After she picked up the rental, didn't she say she went back to her sisters to take a nap. I'm sure she'd claim she got it there.
So much talk about her showering over his body vs using the costco water bottles.
Did anyone think that just maybe she did her haphazard cleaning of the hallway and bathroom area, then she took a shower and then she put him in the shower. She could have used the cup to rinse anything else remaining on her after rinsing him off.
UGH, I hate her! :furious:
:moo:
There seems to have been very little computer/phone forensics done. Nothing like what we saw with the CA case where they could track her pings over the course of weeks, all texts from various phones, etc...
I wonder why so little was done in this case???
It's also possible she wants the jury to think she had a Costco case of water taking up room in the trunk with luggage and 2 gas cans so that there was no room for that pesky 3rd gas can.
Maybe I'm imagining things but to me Darrel sounded almost afraid of JA. Did u see the way she was looking at him when he was testifying? He didn't completely go off the 'script' she had in mind for him but he did mention the gas cans so on her direct she mentioned he was an alcoholic...she might have said worse stuff about him if he had given completely truthful testimony.
I did. Did I miss something?
The tape ended when Juan was asking Flores and was objected to.
The second link was to pics on Huf Post pics, right?
SORRY TIGER - brain is in slow gear tonight. I'm listening to part 2 now. duh to me.
Well said, I also believe he had sex with her that day because having sex with her still did not mean that he wanted to be with her.
Yes I wonder that too! I also wonder why they can't bring home taped testimony to listen to later at night. I know I hear things the second time around that I missed the first time. All they have to rely on are their notes? What if they're bad note takers..
Absolutely hil-Arias!
She probably said ' ONCE MORE for old times sake. Just one more time and I will leave you alone. '
Yeah, I had thought that a possibility until I saw the streaks of bood on the shower walls. I don't see how she could have showered without disturbing them, especially as they were so fresh.
Here's some interesting commentary about Travis's last photo. This blogger is an expert is detecting lies and has had quite a few things to say about Jodi. Her blog is really interesting.
http://blog.eyesforlies.com/2013/03/travis-alexanders-last-photograph.html
Ooops, not sure if we can link to this blog. Mods please delete if this link isn't acceptable.