Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As an official member of the AA fellowship for years now, I can tell you that there is no official book of "ettiquette" as your wording implies as to who/how/when a drunk should or should not be videotaped. In fact being laughed at and videotaped (even by strangers) is one of the consequences we learn to own and learn from if we are truly ready. No one likes to be laughed at, but if it is eye opening enough to get someone into "the rooms" as we call it, it really doesn't matter what method was used to save our lives- a true person in recovery will learn to appreciate the milestone as a gratitude as opposed to a resentment. Just my 2 cents. Hiccup! ;-)
i think she thought that deleting the photos from the card, and then subjecting it to water submersion, would be enough to "destroy" it.
and yes, it was Travis's camera, that he purchased, to my understanding, to take with him on his trip to Cancun.
... off some calories.
Really AM goingto quit lurking and log outand shovel now :grumpy:
I am really stuck on those panties. If TA was such a sexual deviant, why would he send her what equates to ganny panties rather than a thong or bikini style panties with his name on them? They don't look like boy shorts to me, they look like granny panties. Has it been testified to what brand of panties these were or have the actual panties been entered into evidence?
I've recovered many 'deleted' images and videos from memory cards and computer hard drives.
Water does not destroy the media or the digital data thereon.
I think he was supposed to die neatly in the shower
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree 100%. Mr. Martinez does need to take into account (and I'm sure he has) that the older jurors may have fallen for her innocent little girl testimony; may feel angered that such offensive and sexually implicit pictures and experiences have been forced upon her; may not believe that such a frail and delicate young lady could physically inflict such injuries; that she must have been driven by something horrific to possess her to kill; may not be able to 'read' the shower photos, particularly the tricky one of her dragging; may not be able to comprehend how a camera could seemingly take photos on its own; and may not be able to follow the trail of circumstantial evidence of premeditation. I had no trouble with it, and I am over seventy, but I have no doubt most of my peers would. The 'answer yes or no only' technique could cause a train wreck IMO.
I agree. I can't imagine him not being shot first. I posted my theory of the case as follows:
Is it possible that she did shoot him first, say when he was seated in the shower, and that he was unconscious for a while? Her gun jammed so she only gets off one shot. But he's taking too long to die so she knifes him in the chest which bled profusely and washed conveniently down the shower. She sits/leans on the sink trying to figure out what to do next. He wakes up after a few minutes and runs toward her. He is weak, confused, and probably with diminished eyesight (at least in the right eye). She easily evades him. He is unsteady and leans on the sink and coughs out the blood spray. She gets behind him and sets about the business of giving him the remaining 26 stab wounds, which continues as he crawls down the hall. He finally collapses at the end of the hall but still manages to scream for help. At this point she's in a state of frenzy, fury and adrenalin. She cuts his throat to shut him up and end the crisis. Then back to the shower to wash him off.
So what looks like overkill in retrospect isn't. She wanted to shoot him dead in the shower but her gun jammed and he wasn't dying from the one shot. She thought the chest stab was just insurance to finish the job. But he wakes up and she does what she needs to do to finish the job. The whole scene from when he wakes up to her cutting his throat takes less than 30 seconds.
BTW, NurseB does not agree with my "isn't overkill" supposition.
:twocents: "We" in the fellowship also can have differing opinions. Thank you for yours.
(40 years)
Hi I'm new here but have been following this case from day 0. Fascinatingly tragic. At the moment I am really really worried that the jury may be buying Jodi Arias' meek and mild act. I really hope not. She is so horrid I just hope they see her for the manipulator that she is and she is convicted of slaughtering Travis.
I know that court was not in session yesterday (at least not publicly) but does anybody know if they are in court today?
OMG, We're having thunder snow here in So. Calif. We've had a little snow before but it is really snowing and thundering Very strange.
I'm going to regret asking this, but are all the photos of the defendant shown to the jury available online? I've only seen little ms pigtails looking...odd.