Jodi Arias TAKES THE STAND #35 *may contain graphic and adult content*

[Linda7NJ]

FREE EMUS for all who join today!*

*Not really

Mmmmmm I've got the Hellmans!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Quester]

:waiting:

 

[Really?]

Divorcees

 

[elementary]

Just said on HN that when JA was talking about emails or text messages, jurors were NOT taking notes.

interesting,
fran

Although there is one woman obsessively taking notes.

 

[Zeno49]

Total BS

No bishop would call another's bishop.
Just not done.

 

[3trees]

Throw Deanna under the bus.

 

[Davia18]

Wow Jodi talked to abusive TA about going to Bishop, um Jodi a abused woman wouldn't do that , promise I had 18 years expeirence

 

[Linda7NJ]

OMG, Rachel's divorced already?

Says Jodi



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Boodles]

Excuse me, can someone explain what the issue is that Rachel wants JA to go to the bishop about? I must have zoned out. TIA

 

[bexlex]

So she had one friend? The one that kicked her out after 2 weeks of being roomies??

i'd love to see rachel on the stand to substantiate all this!!

 

[Love Never Fails]

OMG, Rachel's divorced already?

Who is Rachel?

 

[ButForFortune]

Also, what I saw right before the break was her looking at some papers. Is she reading notes / following a script?

I'm pretty sure she has a list of buzz words to use from the battered woman's manual and is told to insert them into her testimony as much as she can.

I am also wondering if the jury is catching on that they are being played - something I have been thinking about since last night - do batterers typically have every deviant urge there is? Think about it - the defense has inserted everything: pedophilia including wishing to sodomize little girls, masturbating to little boy pictures, choking Jodi, backhanding Jodi, making Jodi wear demeaning costumes, buying sex toys, throwing candy (that's a new one to me and just too weird), raping her in her sleep, forcing her to have anal sex on the day HE baptizes her, yelling at her, forcing her to take his crummy BMW and PAY for it, making *advertiser censored* movies, having sex in cars by schoolyards, walking up to her on a porch and climaxing on her face while never saying a word. I am sure I have missed tons and tons of it her B.S.

My point is - I think the defense has completely overplayed their hand. Too, too much and most of it spoken by a self-confessed liar and unverifiable.

 

[lonetraveler]

Wow, look at all the damage she did in less than a year.

 

[Isabelle]

He got to voir dire her about an e-mail that they were trying to admit into evidence. He was very aggressive, and she looked scared! :great:

Oh, I hope they replay it!

 

[Sulamith]

Total BS

No bishop would call another's bishop.
Just not done.

Yes they would. Maybe not all, but it is quite common.

 

[magpie]

Back to her baptismal? Good heavens! Nurmi will never STFU, he must love the TV cameras and the sound of his own voice. :banghead:

 

[Zeno49]

It is true that Elder TA would be rebuked and possibly excommunicated if his sexual activities and fantasies were revealed.

TA was NOT temple worthy in May 2008 based on the audio conversation

 

[Linda7NJ]

I object to this line of questioning!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Troubled]

Who is Rachel?

Rachel was the girl JA met through PPL originally. JA lived with Rachel maybe 1-2 weeks before she was asked to move. JA's states because Rachel was getting married not sure what the real reason why she was asked to move.

 

[Linda From New York]

For Christ's sake, Arias, you went MORE than all the way years ago!