My husband has been watching some of the trial and said he thinks the whole pedophile story was her attorney's idea.
I find the pedophilia story a bit perplexing. The defense introduced this story without any possibility of corroboration. As the talking heads have been discussing over the past few days, authentic pedophiles hoard their *advertiser censored* on computers and they have a history of seeking out little boys school teachers, Boy Scout leaders, Camp Volunteers ,etc. TA had no history of being interested in children little boys in particular. TA, I believe, had NOT accessed any *advertiser censored* sites including pedophile sites on his or anybodys computer. The story of TA viewing a collection of hard copy prurient photos spread out on his bed while JA was in the next room and with a door unlocked is incredulous.
When I was in college I had a closet pedophile as a roommate. I had NO idea he was a pedophile until I learned years later that he had become a pediatrician and had molested boys with regularity. What I did note during college days was that this guy never dated women; had no interest in women; and volunteered regularly for boys day camps in the mountains. I didnt give his behavior too much thought at the time because he seemed to be self-conscious, quiet, conservative and otherwise seemed to be good natured guy and a good roommate.
JA will get cut up pretty badly during cross examination on this pedophile claim and Nurmi et al should know that. The defense has foisted enough slanderous material against TA to make their case without invoking this lame incredulous accusation.