Losing it - that and I think they must be livid about this what (to me) seems transparently deliberate stalling for myriad reasons I've mentioned before.
What I'm livid (and sort of happy) about over this is that he really seems to be disregarding the fact that these jurors have lives and are sacrificing so much already with the stunted court time each week... I'm sure he feels justified, but the fact is ever since JA took the stand it's hurt their case exponentially imv.
What I'm happy about (well not happy, because I really feel for these jurors) is that I think they will hold it against JA, Nurmi or both and come to dislike her with each passing, "Now let's back up," or "How did that make you feel?" and her subsequent tangential, irrelevantly detailed responses and unchanging or poorly faked demeanor.
It seems the dislike for her has grown significantly among us on this site, imv, for some of these very reasons (on top of what many/most of us already have on board)
If I were on the jury, I would have been bored a while ago, and that would have been replaces by increasing anger, but that's me.
Nurmi is really disrespecting and insulting the depth of their sacrifice, not only as their civic duty but for HIS client, imv...
I agree this is grating at the jurors. But I don't think Nurmi intends disrespect; I think he is just oblivious to their perspective because he can't see the forest for the trees, IYKWIM. With every little detail he tries to make, he has a point, but doesn't get that the jurors "get the point already". He should pick the most significant points and create the anthology version rather than bore them with the complete works, IMO. But perhaps he fears being accused of not doing his job fully. Being a death penalty case changes everything.
And Jodi, well, this is the most important thing in the world, to her, and in her mind, to everyone else. She would probably be content to sit there and talk about herself forever and day. I think it's called egocentricity!
