Lulu67
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2013
- Messages
- 430
- Reaction score
- 0
I know some folks are comparing the CA trial to this one, but I have to say this:
CA never admitted killing Caylee. She admitting knowing she was dead, but not to killing her in any way, shape or form. I BELIEVE she killed her, although I do not think she intentionally did it (I think she was using Xanax {"zanny"} or chloroform to knock her out so Casey could go party, and she may have given her too much. Once poor Caylee was gone, she threw her away - which is the most heinous thing a person could do, let alone a MOTHER!!), but she hid the fact that she was gone.
Had I been on the jury for the CA trial, I would have BELIEVED she was involved in it, but I would not have been able to convict her of killing her - because there was no PROOF of it. Not even the duct tape - nothing showing that Casey killed her or put duct tape on her. As much as it would have pained me to not find her guilty, I would have had to. BELIEVING someone is guilty is not the same as PROVING it.
With this chick.....she has admitted killing him, lied so many times it's hard to keep track, been caught trying to tamper with a witness's testimony, and shows very few real tears, except for the day she found out the entire s*x tape would be played and not just snippets.
I do hope, and pray to God that this jury will find her guilty of 1st degree murder and she will get the needle. But they are completely different trials.
CA never admitted killing Caylee. She admitting knowing she was dead, but not to killing her in any way, shape or form. I BELIEVE she killed her, although I do not think she intentionally did it (I think she was using Xanax {"zanny"} or chloroform to knock her out so Casey could go party, and she may have given her too much. Once poor Caylee was gone, she threw her away - which is the most heinous thing a person could do, let alone a MOTHER!!), but she hid the fact that she was gone.
Had I been on the jury for the CA trial, I would have BELIEVED she was involved in it, but I would not have been able to convict her of killing her - because there was no PROOF of it. Not even the duct tape - nothing showing that Casey killed her or put duct tape on her. As much as it would have pained me to not find her guilty, I would have had to. BELIEVING someone is guilty is not the same as PROVING it.
With this chick.....she has admitted killing him, lied so many times it's hard to keep track, been caught trying to tamper with a witness's testimony, and shows very few real tears, except for the day she found out the entire s*x tape would be played and not just snippets.
I do hope, and pray to God that this jury will find her guilty of 1st degree murder and she will get the needle. But they are completely different trials.