there was a coupon for some biscotti in the sunday paper. I clipped it and may get some. :giggle:
Lol!!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
there was a coupon for some biscotti in the sunday paper. I clipped it and may get some. :giggle:
I noticed JA took off her glasses to read the journal at one point. Does she need these glasses or are they the DT's way of changing her outift each day? She has several pairs.
It may have already been mentioned so my apologies if it has. These threads move faster than the refresh button.
BUT...didn't JA state she never did anything with Travis that she didn't want to do? said she enjoyed the sex! Not once, when the prosecution was questioning her, did she say a word about legitimate abuse. JA is not a domestic abuse survivor...period!
I don't think the edited sex tape will come in. I believe the entire sex tape will be given to the jury, not this latest desperate attempt by the defense.
None of us should forget that Travis had NO clue JA was tape recording him. She pulled all the strings in this conversation. JA did this to use against Travis. I don't find her credible.
Maybe this woman has multiple personalities, because she is an entirely different person today. The scary thing is, she is SANE in the eyes of court.
Behaviors inconsistent with an abusive personality:
- Encouraging Jodi to date other people.
- Not escalating the relationship to a more serious nature very, very quickly.
- No evidence of stalking or harassing Jodi once she moved back to Yreka.
- No escalation of violence according to testimony on direct.
- No isolation of Jodi - this doesn't mean keeping her from 'his' friends - it means systematically shutting down her every 'outside' resource, sometimes to even include work and family.
- No evidence of financial abuse - instead he was lending her money.
- Nothing to prove incessant emails, non-stop text messages, or constant phone calls on Travis' part.
- No outward evidence of jealousy on Travis' end. Not rising to the level I would expect from an abuser, anyway.
- No testimony from friends or family, in court or elsewhere, to indicate an easily triggered temper, impatience, possessiveness, etc.
- No proof he circumvented her movements - she didn't live with him and he even lent her his car.
- Didn't fly into a rage over a ruined BMW.
- Seemingly actively tried to help Jodi on many fronts.
I noticed JA took off her glasses to read the journal at one point. Does she need these glasses or are they the DT's way of changing her outift each day? She has several pairs.
It may have already been mentioned so my apologies if it has. These threads move faster than the refresh button.
I thought story #2 was the ninjas? Have I missed some stories?:waitasec:BC is now saying the JA's story #2 is the truth. He says she is creating her stories now to protect her family. WTH?
Just finished watching Casarez on the NG program. Once again I do not understand why any TV outlet would have this idiot doing commentary. She spoke of the Conducive Rule when speaking of the possibility that JM would be allowed another shot at JA on cross. I have not a clue what The Conducive Rule is.
This coupled with her past commentary on the AZ Supreme Court InterROCKATORY appeal left me to wonder if this lady actually went to law school.
Then she described JA photos showing injury to her right index finger. Casarez spoke of burns to her finger. The photos did NOT remotely represent burns to anything.
Brian Carr on nancy grace
Says she's going with her second story because they may come after her family
Something about Mormons and blood atonement he claims she could not have dragged travis Travis
This guy makes me ill
Attention seeker! Another one of Jodi's puppets.
I know same here! He needs to be gaggedBrian Carr...is lying!! The Mormons do none of what Brian Carr is saying at... ALL!! Dang I need to call the Nancy Grace show!! Haha!! Never heard of what he just said in my whole entire life! Im pissed off!!! Grrrrrrrr
I disagree Baez didnt get her acquitted
A jury that refused to do their job
Asked no question didnt go over evidence. Their only interest was what resteraunt s judge perry hooked up for them along with movies and entertainment. One juror I think the Forman had a cruise scheduled for the next day! And would loose his money if he didnt go! So in a very short time they gave us the acquittal verdict! And headed back to the sticks!
You are assuming that anything that Jodi claims is TRUE. We have more than enough definitive evidence that she is a PATHOLOGICAL LIAR. She lies and lies and lies and lies.
Therefore, we can't believe anything that comes out of her mouth--especially information that mitigates her slaying of Travis.
People with personality disorders CAN'T be "loved" enough--nothing is enough. It is exhausting. My mom is Borderline PD & I don't even have contact with her since I had children since she is like dealing with a toddler.
Invading someone's personal space--thier HOME, journals, phones, emails, etc. is not someone lacking "love"--it is a sick person who is so selfish and malignant that they think they can control another human being. They are toxic and very scary.
I like Nancy's guest who is now grilling BCarr :lol:
I don't get the hatred for JC on this board. I think she's a good analyst. JMO
BUT...didn't JA state she never did anything with Travis that she didn't want to do? In fact, JA said she enjoyed the sex! Not once, when the prosecution was questioning her, did she say a word about legitimate abuse. JA is not a domestic abuse survivor...period!