midwest mama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2012
- Messages
- 1,303
- Reaction score
- 46
Here is a link to Colorado Human Services, Child Protective Services, with a definition of child abuse under Colorado code.
http://humanservices.mesacounty.us/FCS/template.aspx?id=2090
THANK YOU FOR THIS, BOESP!! After reading this, it is clear the Grand Jury called for an indictment based on evidence that JonBenet's death came at the hands of her parents.
I believe they chose the charges, "Child Abuse Leading to Death" because it is the lesser amount of charges that would have related to the murder and assured greater ease in obtaining an arrest warrant to begin the prosecution process. Though these charges could have been altered "up" before a trial to be more severe, i.e. Felony Murder, or Murder 1 or 2, once the process began and more evidence could have been collected, this gave an absolute starting point which would assure the parents stood a chance of being sentenced in some manner if proved guilty.
Of course, it is possible no more severe charges would have been brought, because penalties for a conviction would have been more much severe, and something the RST team would have countered against from day one. I am sure they would have clutched at the indicted charges.
It is just SICKENING :furious:that AH was not the right person to DO HIS JOB at that time. Question is, is Garnett bold enough to take the steps necessary to consider asking for a charge of Felony Murder against John Ramsey?? Have Ramsey's actions the night of JB's death changed or lessened any, in the eyes of his peers on the GJ at that time, even if the rhetoric has? And if not in their eyes, why should it have changed in anyone elses?