slapithigh
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
- Messages
- 22
- Reaction score
- 0
No, he wasn't. He was booked yesterday at 2.25 PM.
BUT his victim was a girl. An adolescent girl.
Where do you see that the victim was a girl?
No, he wasn't. He was booked yesterday at 2.25 PM.
BUT his victim was a girl. An adolescent girl.
What photo? Darn I missed it. :innocent:
RE. the victim....I am not sure that is the victims name that is listed, who was a juvenile, it may be someone who was acting as their representative.
I agree but wouldn't he have been booked after sentencing even if he was being held? Here he would have been booked again after sentencing because now he is sentenced not being held KWIM? But i have no idea in this case.
I dont think they put the victim name in the dockett stuff. You can request your name be kept private as a victim.Even if the victim is not a minor. At least in my state you can. More then likely it is the GAL.
There's no way to answer that, Jbean. My interpretation is that he has been convicted but not sentenced yet.
He was taken into custody yesterday after the bench trial. I took that to mean that as soon as the trial was over he was taken into custody. I don't think he's been in jail, but I don't know for sure.
I just find it strange that a man who molested and adolescent girl would be interested in a tiny little boy.
Just doesn't fit. The only value I see of knowing about this, again, is that we see that this family has some deep issues.
I find it strange a grown man would Molist anyone female or male. This makes the person NOT normal.
That looks like the trial was 6/16 because it has duration of 30 minutes or so and they put a no bond on him.I didn't see a no bond on him before that,did anyone else?If not,he was running around till yesterday.
I couldn't agree with you more. But most men who molest teenage girls don't molest little bitty boys. Completely different MO.
There's no way to answer that, Jbean. My interpretation is that he has been convicted but not sentenced yet.
He was taken into custody yesterday after the bench trial. I took that to mean that as soon as the trial was over he was taken into custody. I don't think he's been in jail, but I don't know for sure.
I just find it strange that a man who molested and adolescent girl would be interested in a tiny little boy.
Just doesn't fit. The only value I see of knowing about this, again, is that we see that this family has some deep issues.
I couldn't agree with you more. But most men who molest teenage girls don't molest little bitty boys. Completely different MO.
If availability of a victim is a problem, either sex will usually do. mho moo
No, It has a innocent child it in and a innocent female.* Not a mod but a mod has already deleted such photo before*I have a photo of him from his marriage in 2008.
I don't know if I am allowed to post the link?
It also shows his wife and youngest child.
I have a photo of him from his marriage in 2008.
I don't know if I am allowed to post the link?
It also shows his wife and youngest child.