I TOTALLY agree with you. The man was suspicious in August, was blown off by the cops and couldn't help but remain suspicious. When he had the chance, he decided to look again, and poor Caylee was found.
IMO, everyone needs to leave him alone.
Please Tell me....why would it be necessary to put RK on the stand?
Undoubtedly, the defense was euphoric. Mr., "I wanted to be anonymous", likely traded his story for money. He would not talk to the defense, but he's more than willing to profit from Caylee's death.
When he's cross-examined, expect to see him impeached.
Why should he talk to the defense? He can talk to them in court!
:biglaugh:Kronk says that on Aug 11 he and his co-worker had an hour to kill at 1:30pm. They went to Suburban Dr. because it's shady. Apparently, that is when he saw suspicious things. Was he actually at the crime scene then, or some other part of Suburban (closer to the school)?
On Aug. 11, Kronk and his co-worker went to Suburban Drive because they are shady. They felt as if they may have heatstroke when they began to see suspicious things. Where are we they asked each other. They didn't know exactly. They decided to walk into the woods to see if they could figure it out. One of them suggested they cool off in the vehicle. No, let's stay here and look into bags and take pictures of snakes. Besides they could not recall where they had parked. To be continued ......
And another thing :waitasec: I want to know the names of those deputies!
This I do not agree with. A hero would have never said I stopped caring, Not if he really felt there was a 2 yr old rotting away in a plastic bag.
what I got from it was that when LE came out, after that third call, neither of them saw the bag. It must have been moving around. He said the officer looked up and down and didn't see anything. You'd think RK would be saying, "it's right there, dufus!!!"
What in the world is going on here? So he's been to that site in November also? Why would that small detail be left out? Did he find the body then? Could he have been the person on the phone talking to the PI trying to lead him to the body? And since the PI's didn't find it, he went back to the site in December to "just find it himself"? I am so confused about all of this but I am still not convinced that this meter reader is some stand up guy. I knew something was not right about him and now we find about this? I wonder what's going to be said on Tuesday?
Where are we seeing that he was at the "site" in Nov? The article I read stated he was back in the neighborhood for work, but did not go into the woods. It supports what he said to Robin Roberts... LE didn't care, so he stopped caring. We should all be glad he started caring again, in December. NG would still be starting her show off with "WHERE... IS LITTLE CAYLEE?"
Good thing he didn't confuse the snake with his.......oh, nevermind.![]()
HA! The snake was 4 ft long!!!!:snake:![]()
I found it .
http://www.wftv.com/news/18468226/detail.html
SNIP
"I drove over there. I called. The officer showed up. I showed him a picture of a snake that we had found on Monday. He looked kinda shaken up. It was a 6 and a half foot diamondback rattlesnake. "I drove over there. I called. The officer showed up. I showed him a picture of a snake that we had found on Monday. He looked kinda shaken up. It was a 6 and a half foot diamondback rattlesnake."
This makes sense to me, now - pix was taken first time he was at scene. If I was driving around town all day and like to take pix, I'd probably have a camera with me in the truck. I was trying to eliminate the possibility that the pix was taken on Dec 11.
Why would he photograph it and then show it to the officer? I guess to warn him but it seems a little strange.
I don't drive around with a camera and I can't think of anyone I know who does. :waitasec:
On the stand, he will be asked: why did you not warn the tip line that there is a huge rattler in this location and searchers should wear snake boots and use extreme caution.
Wudge, in his very first call to LE, Kronk tells the dispatcher that "we" saw a dead rattlesnake. It was also reported that when the officer came to meet Kronk at the area (Aug 13) Kronk showed him a picture of the dead rattler. Maybe he had it stored in his cell phone.
I've been under the impression there was a live one too.
Practically everybody in my family has a camera on their cell phone and have found them to be very useful tools. Especially, while we are shopping or if we catch ourselves doing something really stupid. :doh:I don't drive around with a camera and I can't think of anyone I know who does. :waitasec: