cathdawg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2009
- Messages
- 1,689
- Reaction score
- 358
Interesting. Unless they have managed to locate these items they were talking about, it doesn't sound like they have much direct evidence implicating him. What about this Eva person? Did she testify directly or was it only her sister? If so then that would be hearsay. While they could get a search warrant with that, surely it would not be admissable in trial. It seems odd that the sister would be testifying and not Eva herself. What does she have to say about this?
If sexual assault took place in the vehicle, presumably that is where she would have been subdued, so why no evidence of that (the blood for example). If the blood originated from events outside the vehicle afterwards, then there should be some sign of it in or on the vehicle as well. All of this happened in one and a half hours, that does not seem to be enough time to have fetched her, done the deed and disposed of the body without leaving more than a few traces in the vehicle. The sister claimed that he had come home stinking of gasoline. If so, there should have been some residue of that in the vehicle. Was there? what about his shoes? Bleach would not have destroyed all signs of blood, there would be something left (not to mention bleach itself).
FYI
http://articles.kwch.com/2010-11-18/adam-longoria_24839542