Did anyone see this article that claims that the preliminary testing on DNA collected was
not a match to Timothy Madden. Both sides are requesting that all DNA be retested, which was expected around January 2017.
I couldn't find if anything else was said of it?
https://wronglyconvictedgroup.wordpress.com/2016/12/10/timothy-madden/
I'm leery about that article. The author says:
According to reports, there is DNA evidence linking Timothy to the crime,
however no details are available, and
an anonymous report suggests the DNA may not in fact have matched, and KSP was under undue pressure to find a suspect and may have rushed to judgement:
My bolding. The claim is that Madden may be innocent because there are "no details available" and cites an anonymous report to support the claim. So that implies this is simply a member of the public speculating, just like we do here at WS. It goes on to say that Madden's an "unlikely suspect" because he's married, has five children and had been caring for his ill wife. We've all seen cases where a seemingly upstanding person is fully capable of committing a heinous crime so I can't give much credence to someone basically arguing from his own personal incredulity.
He goes on to quote Madden's defense attorney who said Mr. Madden has not changed anything he has said.
That's all this person is basing their belief on that Timothy Madden is innocent and is being falsely accused. IMO we need to wait and see what evidence LE has against Madden; there's no point in trying to second guess the evidence like this person is doing without knowing all the data. If there are holes in the prosecution's claims they will come out during the trial.
Furthermore, the group defines itself as:
"This is the website of the Wrongly Convicted Group, a grass-roots group of advocates working to obtain justice for innocent people on death row or serving long prison sentences due to Wrongful Convictions."
I couldn't find any link to who belongs to this group, i.e. professional people such as lawyers or LE. Compare that to the
Innocence Project. I'm open to listening to anyone who has better information about the people running the site but until then I am not convinced that this is anything more than a group of people who follow cases of wrongful conviction but are not involved in the process of presenting evidence.
All this is JMO - I tend to be a bit skeptical when I see statements that aren't backed up with evidence.