Hey guys...don't know if anyone checks this thread anymore, but here's an interview I found that Joshua Young has done after the verdict:
http://www.courier-journal.com/Vide...a-Young-gives-first-interview-after-acquittal
I don't know what to think. He for sure seems very innocent in this...speaking all soft-spokenly and all that....but I keep thinking that we all know how good of an actor his Dad is, maybe he got some of his acting/fooling genes.
Also thought it was interesting when the reporter asked him if he would ever talk to his Dad again, or visit him or smetihng like that, and he gave a long pause and said "I don't know." Then later in the ineterivew, after the reporter is going over how he feels about all the people testifying against him, and how he feels about his dad blaming it on him, then he asks him again do you wanna see your dad again....and this time Little Josh says "no, no I don't." Seems like he's just saying that 'cause he figured out it's what he's "supposed" to say. I dunno, maybe I'm reading too much into that.
I also felt like he was lying about the part where he says how good friends him and Trey were. All the rest of his answers were so short and to-the-point, this was the only question he elaborated on (by that I mean gave more than yes or no or 3-word answer). He said yeah, we were good friends. then he says we never had any problems, not a bad word or problem between us. Like I said, b/c all his other answers were pretty much yes or no, I felt like he was going out of his way to show they were "cool."
I also thought the reporter was very sympathetic towards hiim and did a shi*** interview. He could have at leaset asked him, "so what do you think happened that night?"
One more thing, on the Save Joshua Young or whatever it is, Facebook page, one lady said her daughter was a juror and they both with Little Josh the best. Then she says "I think his Gouker and the cuz did it"...I guess meaning the cousin Cassie. So I'm assuming that after the trial the daughter and her discussed it and I'm deducing that the daughter came away from the trial thinking Gouker and Cassie did it. Which to me is ridiculous, I did not believe that Cassie did it and I cannot believe her testimony came across in such a way that someone coudl think that! I thought Cassie was, as the prosecutor said, NOT sophisticted enough to do it with Gouker and then cover-up he rinvolvement and then get on the stand and act calm. Geez. From the juror's mom's comment that she and her daughter wished Little Josh well and the mom was on the Save Joshua Young facebook page, I get that the juror thought Little Josh had nothing to do with everything. I could understand if the jurors thought that he was in some way involved, but they just didn't have enought evidence to convict, but this lady thought he was actually innocent.