,"We understand that we have free access to the media but are limiting statements to the media to keep the integrity of the investigation intact.
Any actions taken by the investigation, or by us, are based on the best interests of Kyron and K. and comply with the law. Beyond this, we have no comment on the matter."
I think we all knew the LE and family was tight-lipped for just this reason - "to keep the integrity of the investigation intact" i.e., making sure this doesn't get thrown out of court for any reason.
What a horrific nightmare this family is going through.
Hi all...I have been "listening in" for some time now and hoping for the best. I'm wondering if any one else feels like referring to a child's "best interest" gives an impression that said child may still be with us?
"Any actions taken...are based on the best interest of Kyron and K....and comply with the law."
We have been fully briefed by law enforcement on the on-going criminal investigation.
We are in complete support of that investigation.
We have asked the Multnomah County Sheriffs Office to facilitate releasing this statement for us due to their access to the media/flash news.
We understand that we have free access to the media but are limiting statements to the media to keep the integrity of the investigation intact.
Any actions taken by the investigation, or by us, are based on the best interests of Kyron and K. and comply with the law. Beyond this, we have no comment on the matter.
Desiree, Tony and Kaine
It is possible but it is also possible it was done to shorten the statement. How would they have worded it otherwise??
"Any actions taken.... are based on the best interests of baby K...and the recovery of Kyron in compliance with the law."
"Any actions taken...are based on the goal of bringing Kyron home while continuing to do what is best for baby K and complying with the law."
Really... any other way sounds too wordy. You really cannot be 100% sure that you are looking for a body until you find it. Finding him is in Kyron's best interest no matter how they find him... Getting justice for him is ALSO in his best interest.
I think it's more likely to refer to all of that... just easier to put it all together and in keeping with the being vague.
This is it for me. The briefing gave them cause to make this statement, but I also think it came after Kaine took legal action.the first line really grabbed my attention...
Thay Have Been Fully Briefed by Law Inforcement on the Ongoing Criminal Investigation.
So... being fully briefed seemed to have an impact... on all three of them. ??
In both the raw interview, and an interview on this morning's Today show, I noticed that Kyron's dad said that he could not comment first hand on Terri's feelings, etc. I don't remember the exact wording, but I noticed that he seemed to be trying to separte himself from her. I took away two things from this: it sounded like he was not directly speaking to her (maybe he holds too much resentment toward her, since she was the last one to see her??), or maybe the POI is related/connected to Terri, and Kaine has been instructed to sound like he is not "with" Terri, as some sort of strategy to connect with the suspect??
Maybe I am looking into this, and he meant nothing other than he can't speak for Terri first hand, because he ISN'T Terri, but I just thought he somehow seemed to be distancing himself from her in both interviews. Did anyone else feel this way?
Somewhere last night after all this broke loose...I could swear I read that TH was going to release a statement? Did I imagine that...?
At about 3:00 in the raw video, the reporter asks if it's true Terri took 2 polygraphs.
Kaine: (big sigh continued through the first few stumbled words) um... (pause) my, I, based on where we're at with the case, I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna comment on that. I know she was speaking on behalf of Terri um, and that's actually something that we're trying to make sure is clear in our communications outward is when, we're gonna be, our family is the only group of individuals that will be speaking on our behalf. We fully expect that other people will come out with things to say, potentially defend friends or some of our family members. We expect that but we want to make it pretty clear that we're the ones speaking on our own behalf. No one else is speaking on our behalf.
He certainly knew some things - whether he had been told by LE or just experienced them being at home with TH, don't know. I caught that in the interview on Friday. Also how he wouldn't comment on her reaction to the flyer being put out.I'm bringing this forward from the bioparents' interviews. This is something Kaine said that's been tickling at the back of my brain since last night. We had quite a bit of discussion about what he may have meant by this.
Look particularly at the part I bolded in light of the new statement released last night. Note also the big long sigh and stumbling on words, which I didn't notice in other parts of the interviews.
It looks to me like Kaine had some info on Friday when the interviews took place. What do you all think?
"Sources close to the Horman family revealed turmoil within the family Monday. Terri Horman's father, Larry Moulton, said 18-month-old Kiara Horman is no longer living at the family's home. Other sources close to the family said Kaine Horman took Kiara out of the home..."
http://www.kptv.com/news/24080333/detail.html
"Well, here's what we have to believe if we believe her. We have to believe, as Marc Klaas said, that if she is telling the truth that someone, a pedophile, a boogie man of sorts, grabbed that little boy within feet of her and within seconds of her turning away from her child inside the school," Delong said. "And then we are to believe that since he's been gone three weeks that the child, that they got away with it. With all kinds of people around and no one saw a thing. That's pretty hard to believe. Could it happen? Possibly. Is it likely that that's what happened? I don't think so."