I'm going to jump off of your post, Whiteorchids, to clear something up. Whoever posted that BSL "spared" the girl's virginity was mistaken. It is true, per the police report, that he did not assault her vaginally, but there is nothing in the report to indicate it was due to any compassion on his part.
I believe the error came about when a reader(s) misinterpreted this part of the victim's statement:
"She went on to say that he..., but did not have intercourse with her. She told him that she was a virgin and said he wasn't going to take that away from her."
Note the underlined words. There is no "he" between "and" and "said".
It's an easy mistake to make if you scan through the report quickly, but it makes a striking difference to an understanding of the crime and the perpetrator's intentions, IMO. Unfortunately, there is no link because when the news outlet realized the redacted portions were still visible, it removed the document from its site.