And with all due respect, we do a lot more investigative journalism than some of our readers seem to give us credit for. I've spent weeks, even months, digging things up and making connections that other media outlets report on months later, proclaiming they broke the story. Granted, we are limited in the size of our staff and other resources. But I won't sit back and let anyone say we don't do investigative journalism. Will we report unsubstantiated rumors? No. Will we use unnamed/anonymous sources? No. That hinders us, but I believe it also makes us more credible sources. Anyone can post anything online these days. I believe what separates professional journalists from blogs and rumors is that we vet information and cite sources by name. (Stepping off my soap box now. Have a great day. I need to get to the courthouse to cover the grand jury. Wonder if the investigative journalists you're so impressed with will be there? Doubt it.)
No offense to you, and with a lot of respect for your calling, I'm going off what's in the newpaper that reaches the public. I find that there is a very low percentage of the paper devoted to what I would call "investigative journalism." I am aware that y'all are limited by your "TOS," so to speak, but I see so many problems in Lafayette that could be addressed in the newspaper that are not, due to Gannett's corporate decision to run mostly AP content off the wire.
Where is the investigative story on the true nature of the dispute between Parish President Joey Durel and his threat to cut off firefighting services to the town of Broussard over "stolen" water?
Where is the investigative story on the criminal decision to open the new Ambassador-Caffery extension with no speed limit signs whatsoever, or even signs with the names of the intersections for the first month, so that local dragsters treated it as their personal strip at all hours of the night until a girl was killed?
Where is the investigative story on the decision to place no traffic control at Amb.-Caffery extension and Chemin Metairie, forcing residents and school buses to play an insane game of "Chemin-Metairie chicken," darting across multiple lanes of traffic near a blind curve, resulting in the tragic death of a young woman only a week after the road was opened, and then the Parish decision to jackhammer up fresh concrete to block off Chemin Metairie and put in dangerous U-turn lanes, instead of doing the sensible thing and putting up a stop light?
Where is the investigative story on the graffiti that has turned the area into a visual ghetto since around 2010, and the fact that a city councilman tried to do something about it last summer and got no support and it was swept under the rug?''
Where is the investigative story on the trash contracts, and the fact that each new year brings a huge increase in bills to residents, for 5 years running?
Where is the investigative report on the refusal, year after year, to place a traffic light at Verot School Rd. and Failla Rd., forcing the entire one-lane Verot traffic to come to a complete halt and creating gridlock every time someone wants to turn left on Failla - after the parish allowed a big subdivision down Failla that created more traffic?
Where is the investigative story on how allowing untrammeled growth on Ambassador Caffery without commensurate traffic-control measures, has turned that side of town into a parking-lot nightmare, completely unnavigable at many times of day, without any government plan to relieve the gridlock?
I can go on and on. There are so many problems here that make living here a pain in the butt, that do not see the light of day in the local paper.
I understand that your resources are limited. I stand by my belief that Lafayette is woefully underserved by The Advertiser, and that Gannett. Inc. is to blame - not the reporters. I hope you won't take this as a personal attack.
Not having an adequate newspaper means that the town doesn't have a mirror in which to check its own appearance, nor an adequate public feedback mechanism to help self-govern.