chicken fried
Verified LOCAL
- Joined
- May 27, 2012
- Messages
- 1,813
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm new here and this is my first time posting. I was looking for the answer to why the gj would be held in lafayette. I think this will answer the question.
Rule 14.1 Allotment - Defendant With More Than One Felony Case
(a) Unless a different method is set forth in Appendix 14.1, if a defendant has a felony case pending and previously allotted, any new felony arrest for that defendant shall be allotted to the division to which the pending felony was allotted. This Afelonies-following-felonies@ rule also applies to any pending felony arrests for a co-defendant with a new arrest and billed as a co-defendant
http://www.lasc.org/rules/dist.ct/FINALRULES.PDf
Welcome!!!! You have fast fingers
That's interesting... I'll have to read more from that source to get smarter.
So as I read it.. it said that if a felony is pending (let's say - the Shunick case) - then an additional felony shall be in the same district... so the Pate indictment would have to be in the 15th District, too.
But Crowley is also in the 15th District. I would like to find some rules on where grand juries must be held, vis a vis where the crime occurred.
Maybe LE decided that they wanted to present both cases at once - and so used some clause to move the Pate indictment to Lafayette.
Have we thought about this:
The grand jurors were presented with TWO cases in one sitting - expecting to get ONE.
Wouldn't that have subconsciously bolstered both cases - and increased the chances of a true bill on both??? Pretty smart move, maybe.
thanks again for the info, and
:welcome4: