Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Personally, I think that the fine men who penned the Constitution 250 years ago might think differently about things if they had been able to see into the future, i.e. internet child *advertiser censored*, mass shootings, etc...JMO
I would be agreeable to using truth serum in a case like this, though I don't know how reliable it is.
Different things would work for different people.
Hypnotism....give it a try. IMO
I don't think they would think differently because innocent people might be accused. We're all looking at this from the outside in. If we or one of our loved ones was wrongfully accused, we'd be thanking God for the way the Constitution was written.
I guess, but I think innocent people might talk to the police a little bit. Anyway it is just me...I would talk to the police, at least until they start accusing me overmuch.
What is more curious to me is why they would find out that there was evidence on a tape at a newspaper and NOT pick up that evidence. The only thing I can think of is that maybe once they pick up the evidence the defense attorney can request to see it? Or once they pick up the evidence the public can see it? Or did L/E not want someone in their own office to see it? Somehow they were preventing that evidence from being shared by NOT picking up that video. It makes no sense. What if that building burned down and they lost their only evidence--the tape? I have never heard of the FBI finding evidence on a video and leaving the video at the place where it was filmed. Like -- if a iCircle K was robbed and they had the video of the perp -- the police would not leave the video at the Circle K for two weeks-- somebody might ruin it or lose it or whatever. For the life of me I just cannot wrap my mind around why L/E would not pick up that tape immediately. Ideas?
What if the "tape" wasn't exactly a tape but a computer mainframe. I doubt the paper would allow one of their backup systems to be toted out of the building. Copies would need to be made.
I wonder if maybe someone at the paper watched it a few more times and finally saw something they had not seen before and called LE back to come down and look at it one last time? And by then LE knew what to look for and saw it, so they grabbed it?
Or maybe, since it was located at a media outlet, they wanted to publish the video and maybe LE had to involve a judge to get an injunction of some kind or had to get a warrant to get possession of the "tape"?
What if the "tape" wasn't exactly a tape but a computer mainframe. I doubt the paper would allow one of their backup systems to be toted out of the building. Copies would need to be made.
Can any local help me out here. I came across a name late last night with respect to BSL that I had not heard before that BSL must of at one point associated himself with.
How would Arnaudville, LA fit into this picture? Or could it? If it could fit into a search area, how would it fit in? Is this an area he could of lived? Or is it just an area that he could of possibly received his mail at such as a mailing address?
I apologize for the drive by posting here but the office is busy. and I thank anyone that can shed some light on this area.
Can any local help me out here. I came across a name late last night with respect to BSL that I had not heard before that BSL must of at one point associated himself with.
How would Arnaudville, LA fit into this picture? Or could it? If it could fit into a search area, how would it fit in? Is this an area he could of lived? Or is it just an area that he could of possibly received his mail at such as a mailing address?
I apologize for the drive by posting here but the office is busy. and I thank anyone that can shed some light on this area.
I guess, but I think innocent people might talk to the police a little bit. Anyway it is just me...I would talk to the police, at least until they start accusing me overmuch.
This post reminded me of Lauren Spierer's case. When the management of her apartment complex refused to turn over surveillance video without a warrant, LE got the warrant and practically busted the doors down. They confiscated a good bit of electronic equipment, including computers. I would think the situation was handled differently in this case considering that we're talking about the town newspaper. But if LE needed the mainframe, they could've gotten it with a warrant.
I guess, but I think innocent people might talk to the police a little bit. Anyway it is just me...I would talk to the police, at least until they start accusing me overmuch.