Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Psychiatrists were scheduled to tell a Louisiana judge Tuesday whether they believe a man can help his lawyers defend him against charges that he bludgeoned, beheaded and dismembered his disabled 7-year-old son and put the boy's head in the yard.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/10/18/ap/business/main20122130.shtml
declared not fit to stand trial
This man's mental state fits the requirements of the law in order to be deemed unable to stand trial. I totally agree with the decision. He is one of the very, very few individuals I think meets the requirements.
I'm not a big fan of the insanity excuse: for example, I think Andrea Yates showed consciousness of guilt, and I agree with the decision to hold her legally responsible for her actions. This guy, he really did not show ANY consciousness of guilt. He put Jori's head by the road!
But fear not, if he is ever declared mentally fit, he will be accountable for his crime. And if he is never brought to trial, there is always eternal judgement.
It sure does look like one!
Is that bruising on his throat? If all of this is bruising how can they not charge the mother with neglect or something. She's not blind.
I do not have a link for this, so y'all can take it or leave it. Hubby has a co-worker with ties to the jail this "daddy" is being kept in......reports are that "daddy" was beaten half to death his first night in jail, was patched up and put back into general population, where he was promptly beaten again.
I am NOT a believer in vigilantism but I have to admit that in this instance, I cannot blame the inmates who put action to their disgust in what "daddy" had done.
Grand jury to hear child-slaying case Friday
Published: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 6:08 p.m.
Last Modified: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 9:37 p.m.
A panel of jurors will decide Friday if there is enough evidence against a Thibodaux man accused of killing his 7-year-old son to take the case to trial.
snip
Wright’s case will be presented to a grand jury Friday, said District Attorney Cam Morvant II.
http://www.dailycomet.com/article/2...y-hears-evidence-Fri-in-boy-s-beheading&tc=ar
This man's mental state fits the requirements of the law in order to be deemed unable to stand trial. I totally agree with the decision. He is one of the very, very few individuals I think meets the requirements.
I'm not a big fan of the insanity excuse: for example, I think Andrea Yates showed consciousness of guilt, and I agree with the decision to hold her legally responsible for her actions. This guy, he really did not show ANY consciousness of guilt. He put Jori's head by the road!
But fear not, if he is ever declared mentally fit, he will be accountable for his crime. And if he is never brought to trial, there is always eternal judgement.
Some kids with disabilities bang their heads against walls.
I would not be sad if that was the truth.
Seriously? They needed to send this to a grand jury?
I'm the exact opposite! This man was clear-headed and not confused or bizarre acting when he confessed. He has no mental health history. Yates was in and out of mental hospitals repeatedly, going from severe post-partum depression to severe post-partum psychosis. She hallucinated, had disorganized thoughts and was not supposed to be alone with the kids, due to fears she may hurt them. She looked like a crazy person during her whole trial. Since her first verdict, she gets better via medication and then goes insane again once she's lucid enough to realize what she's done. It's an endless, horrific cycle. I first thought she was 100% responsible until i read about the case.
But this guy? Is he slapping feces on himself like Loughner? Hearing voices? Hallucinating? Speaking in a word salad?
Yates justified what she did thinking God told her her kids would be doomed if she didn't kill them and send them to heaven. That's totally crazy. She heard messages from the t.v. That's psychosis. This killed the "dummy" because he was angry, according to him. No voices, no bizarre justification which would make him incapable of knowing what he was doing or that what he was doing was wrong. he knew it was wrong and didn't care because he was being sent packing and had nothing left.
From what I have heard of this demon, he did what many evil people do, like that piece of human excrement, Rodriguez who killed Juliani Cardenas after flipping off his ex's mother, because he was "angry" that he had been thrown out: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20030282-504083.html. Or, like that pig Ramazan Acar who gutted his two year old daughter like an animal after taunting her mother about what he was going to do and then taunting her again about how their daughter lay next to him with her guts hanging out: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Acar-jailed-life-stabbing-daughter-dead.html
These are vile, disgusting humans with so much rage inside that they don't care what happens to them, and whether an innocent baby gets hurt, just so long as they can get revenge. That's certainly not normal and I guess it could be considered crazy, but not the kind, IMO, that proves they are incompetent to stand trial or legally insane.
I do not believe in the death penalty. I would not cry if this monster was sentenced to death and executed. Hypocritical? Perhaps, but this is one of the most horrific, appalling and sickening cases I have heard of. A disabled baby. Decapitated by his own father. What is left to say?
BBMWell, right now the court's main concern is competency - whether he's able to understand the court proceedings and assist his attorneys on his case. Right now, he's not competent to stand trial. This is different than saying he was insane at the time of the offense, and thus not culpable. He could have easily known what he was doing and can appreciate his actions, but his mental break occurred during or immediately following the event. Right now, the court's task is trying to restore him to competency so he can stand trial - and then there will be the questions of whether he was insane or not during Jori's murder.
Competency to stand trial and criminal insanity as a defense are two different things. He's not competent now, but that doesn't mean they won't find him guilty once he's been medicated a treated.