Agree totally. Totally agree. I agree. Can you tell?I think something that non-locals need to realize is that our newscaster/reporters are just not accustomed to something this high profile. They will word things incorrectly and are nervous and all that.
I haven't heard anything relevant to MS in the past hour that I've been listening. But, for those interested, we do have an open thread in the scanner forum where members can post and discuss scanner transmissions.if anyone wants a link to the live scanner feed of the Lafayette PD, Sherrif, and Fire here it is:
http://www.radioreference.com/apps/audio/?action=cwp&ctid=1136
i doubt they would be discussing anything relevant to the case, but its a good listen
I think it was Shimon Perez in Israel recently who said that there was no 'true freedom in this world' until facebook. And that is why he joined. I personally think that is why everyone should join; although I know many people who are not on any social networking sites yet.I'm starting to get confused. The rules are not so clear-cut in our new media age.
Are we determining that because one of the prominent local news broadcasters is putting an announcement on their social media page, we can't report it the same as if it were on TV?
What are we going to do when the whole world goes onto Facebook, and all news reporting is then banned, and then this blog has no information to discuss?
I'm just being rhetorical,so please take it in the spirit of discussion, not defiance, but I can see where Facebook is upsetting a lot of traditions. I also see how a lot of NEWS reporting is going onto Facebook. The reporters need to remember that not everyone belongs to Facebook, and when they start making news available only on Facebook then they are abandoning significant portions of the populace to ignorance of the goings-on.
In the Celina Cass case, it took quite a long time for them to bring the body to the surface. They do not want to disrupt any potential evidence when they bring a body to the surface. So, if they are searching for a body, you might as well go to bed.
I think a backpack is a good guess. But I'm not sure it would float. Some types of shoes might float. Did she have a basket on the bike that might float?
Man, I just got a detailed lesson on dive lights and I'm not sure I retained any of it :/ something about how if it's basic police scuba search teams they are using hand held lights. In the Atchafalaya basin with excellent visibility they will only see about an arms length in front of them. Searching with a light is especially difficult in that water because it reflects off the "murk" . He said its much more of a feel than look thing. Something something something...and he's still talking... Hope that helped somewhat?
I thought she was found on the San Fransisco bay shore. Maybe I'm wrong.Awful. Lacy peterson was found under a bridge too.
Man, I just got a detailed lesson on dive lights and I'm not sure I retained any of it :/ something about how if it's basic police scuba search teams they are using hand held lights. In the Atchafalaya basin with excellent visibility they will only see about an arms length in front of them. Searching with a light is especially difficult in that water because it reflects off the "murk" . He said its much more of a feel than look thing. Something something something...and he's still talking... Hope that helped somewhat?
I'm thinking confession or someone who knows the perp told the LE to go back to Whiskey Bay. Moo
If you exit the thread and reload the page and then reenter the thread, it should take you back to your spot.
*Should* LOL
I think something that non-locals need to realize is that our newscaster/reporters are just not accustomed to something this high profile. They will word things incorrectly and are nervous and all that.
Man, I just got a detailed lesson on dive lights and I'm not sure I retained any of it :/ something about how if it's basic police scuba search teams they are using hand held lights. In the Atchafalaya basin with excellent visibility they will only see about an arms length in front of them. Searching with a light is especially difficult in that water because it reflects off the "murk" . He said its much more of a feel than look thing. Something something something...and he's still talking... Hope that helped somewhat?
I thought she was found on the San Fransisco bay shore. Maybe I'm wrong.
"execute a secondary search for Mickey because potential evidence is still there"
That's from the KLFY news page. (http://www.klfy.com/story/18570540/missing-mickey-shunick)
Why would they word it that way? a secondary search for Mickey...this is only my second post, not sure if I'm allowed to quote that or what...please let me know!
Man, I just got a detailed lesson on dive lights and I'm not sure I retained any of it :/ something about how if it's basic police scuba search teams they are using hand held lights. In the Atchafalaya basin with excellent visibility they will only see about an arms length in front of them. Searching with a light is especially difficult in that water because it reflects off the "murk" . He said its much more of a feel than look thing. Something something something...and he's still talking... Hope that helped somewhat?
Mais sha, dat's write.C'mon now. They will say that no matter if it's not high profile! LOL you know dat's da troof!
I think something that non-locals need to realize is that our newscaster/reporters are just not accustomed to something this high profile. They will word things incorrectly and are nervous and all that.