I see your angle...Well, I know a book-keeper that I will never hire.
But, if you need someone who is loyal and always has your back no matter what...
She is that!
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
I see your angle...Well, I know a book-keeper that I will never hire.
straight from the Jodi Arias mitigation stage...
"She told jurors that she had been a victim of abuse as an adult and as a child. She showed several family photos from holidays and vacations. She claimed she was a gentle person who caught spiders in cups and took them outside rather than kill them. "
https://www.cnn.com/2013/05/21/justice/arizona-jodi-arias-trial/index.html
One thing I found odd was that neither of the accused took the opportunity to speak when given the opportunity. After sitting through both trials I am still left wondering which of these two actually pulled the trigger. You can theorize that it was Millard, after all, it was his girlfriend, his father, his truck. Why wouldn't Smich stand up yesterday and say "I'm sorry for my part in this, but I never killed anybody"? Then there is that text about the knife, Millard saying "I might ask you to use it someday". Perhaps it was Millard that supplied the tools and it was Smich that did the dirty work? This would seem to make sense, Millard as the ringleader couldn't speak because it would be an admission of guilt, while Smich is silenced by the knowledge that he was just a hit man, killing those that Millard directed him to.
It also has to be understood that both these guys will appeal their convictions, so they don't want to admit their involvement, but one has to think that if Smich simply aided in the planning and disposal phases, he would have spoken up, especially when the prospect of salvaging 25 years of your life is at stake.
Did he not do that sort of thing when he was on the Stand in the Bosma trial. He gave a doozy of a story that admitted he was there, but was innocent of most actions that resulted in a severe crimes. i.e didn't help put Mr. Bosma in the incinerator.
Not sure what he could do different to help at sentencing?
MOO
Well didn't they have that agreement this time they wouldn't throw each other under the bus at this trial IIRC?bbm
And that silence, my friends, speaks volumes.
All MOO
Omg seriouslystraight from the Jodi Arias mitigation stage...
"She told jurors that she had been a victim of abuse as an adult and as a child. She showed several family photos from holidays and vacations. She claimed she was a gentle person who caught spiders in cups and took them outside rather than kill them. "
https://www.cnn.com/2013/05/21/justice/arizona-jodi-arias-trial/index.html
Omg seriously
Sent from my SM-T320 using Tapatalk
I have a confession. I have not always been so kind to the Arachnid family.
Walt freaking Disney over there lolWell, DM does have a history of plagiarism. :laughing:
For me the lol moment was the character reference from a cell mate 🤦Also had to LOL at M Burns recollections of her son at ages 2 and 5. Sure, MB.
http://torontosun.com/news/crime/do...ocial&utm_source=Twitter#link_time=1518568573
Lol, cool story. He treats insects better than he treats humans."He is a good friend to insects, and actually accompanies spiders outside, she wrote."
Is it me, or does this line sound like it came directly out of the mouth of DM? Did he not write about one of these spider encounters in his letters to CN? A tale worthy of the sycophant fox telling, IMO.
and this one by Pillay also sounds like a DM self assessment.
BBM
Pillay says Millard had an "advantaged childhood" and was "advanced beyond his years."
by Adam Carter 3:26 PM
MOO
It would have just been the two of them pointing the finger at the other. Which in my opinion, makes them both look equally guilty, which they are.One thing I found odd was that neither of the accused took the opportunity to speak when given the opportunity. After sitting through both trials I am still left wondering which of these two actually pulled the trigger. You can theorize that it was Millard, after all, it was his girlfriend, his father, his truck. Why wouldn't Smich stand up yesterday and say "I'm sorry for my part in this, but I never killed anybody"? Then there is that text about the knife, Millard saying "I might ask you to use it someday". Perhaps it was Millard that supplied the tools and it was Smich that did the dirty work? This would seem to make sense, Millard as the ringleader couldn't speak because it would be an admission of guilt, while Smich is silenced by the knowledge that he was just a hit man, killing those that Millard directed him to.
It also has to be understood that both these guys will appeal their convictions, so they don't want to admit their involvement, but one has to think that if Smich simply aided in the planning and disposal phases, he would have spoken up, especially when the prospect of salvaging 25 years of your life is at stake.
His quote of DM is appalling. LB and TB didn't get to live out their lives and see what it had to offer.Looks like Millard has made friends in jail. Another good reason to leave him there:
http://torontosun.com/news/crime/do...ocial&utm_source=Twitter#link_time=1518568573
His quote of DM is appalling. LB and TB didn't get to live out their lives and see what it had to offer.
http://torontosun.com/news/crime/double-murderers-lauded-by-family-and-in-one-case-a-cellmate“Death is inevitable but as Dellen says, ‘Why invite it early and not live it out to see what it has to offer,’”
ABro has published Madeleine Burns’ letter in its entirety on her website. Thank you very much, Ann!
http://www.annrbrocklehurst.com/201...t-of-dellen-millard.html/madeleineburnsletter
ETA: Although I am empathetic to MB as, after all, she is DM’s Mom, I am speechless as to the contents of her “character” letter.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk