Really? How exactly?
By showing/playing for the jury the interviews.
JMO
Really? How exactly?
All LE are not perfect people. some are just as corrupt as the criminals.
Seems SY has his mind made up ..I dont think I would meet with him either.
You are the one stating, repeatedly, LE wants to interview them without an attorney.
Originally Posted by JeannaT
Unreasonable to exercise your right to an attorney, guaranteed in the constitution? I wouldn't call insisting on my miranda rights unreasonable.
And I hate to be a flag draper, but people have died for that right.
~snip~
Could you please provide a link for this? tia
Is this enough time for a "cause of death unknown"? If so, I think baby Lisa wil be found soon... just like Caylee Anthony...
You of course have a right to your opinion, however, I disagree with you. I don't see where these parents are being "railroaded" at all. The tiniest bit of info could open this case wide open. This information could seem to be not important or relevant to the parents but could mean everything in finding Lisa. The parents haven't had any problem at all with putting their mugs on every talk show they can so why are they so hesitant at giving LE whatever they need in this investigation? LE doesn't pay for interviews, so I guess cooperating with LE isn't very profitable to them. The parents seem to be more aggravated that LE took the computers which prevents them from publishing more photos of Lisa and probably prohibits them from making even more money from "licensing fees" than they could make otherwise. I do not see where putting their faces on national TV shows help in anyway to find baby Lisa. However, I can see where cooperating with LE might help find Lisa.
unrestricted means IMHO, that NO line of questioning is off limits. Children, brother, anybody, everybody or whatever the investigators feel is necessary to get the questions they need answered done. Unrestricted IMHO means they can ask about anything in your life that might be pertainent to the abduction of your daughter.
The family is insisting they had nothing to do with, wearing shirts with ABDUCTED. So LE has every right to delve into every part of their lives, before and after Lisa went mission as well as during.
LE has the right and the power to interrogate anyone they want if they have reasonable suspicion. Do you think Jersey could have said "umm... no thanks"? Of course not- if there was reasonable suspicion they have the right to take you in for questioning.
Surely, after 17 hours, they have enough evidence for probable cause to just do what they need to do. And if they don't- then there is a good chance the parents are innocent and LE is misusing their power.
disclaimer: I don't have data that would make me think LE is misusing their power- which brings me back to my point: if there is reason to believe they have more information, then take them in. Don't waste time complaining to the media!
No... she can't. There is not enough evidence yet to charge her with murder, unless they have a whole lot more than we know about. It takes a little more than ONE hit from ONE dog, (which could be unreliable) and we don't even know whose deceased body was on that floor, it could have been from years ago.
That's your opinion. I disagree because I don't believe dogs can detect decomposition "from years ago" nor is it a fact that there was ever another dead body on that floor years ago.
JMO
I am absolutely POSITIVE the new detectives will be briefed on what she said before and can follow up.
after all they have rights, too bad about a missing child but let's focus National media. Priorities after all.
and still a baby is missing but thank God her parent have attys to help them avoid cooperation.
By showing/playing for the jury the interviews.
JMO