Wait, what ... did she really say this somewhere?
http://www.hlntv.com/video/2013/03/21/dissecting-jodis-interrogation-tapes
Wait, what ... did she really say this somewhere?
My belief is he literally crawled up that hallway in a desperate attempt to get away from his attacker. It would have been an instinctive reaction and when his strength was depleted, he could crawl no further, she slit his throat.
:cry:
MOO
imho: This stunningly awful and outrageous 'expert' for the defense is nailing Jodi Arias' coffin shut on her. I also wonder, due to his conduct in this case alone, how many complaints to his governing boards have already been made.
Maybe it's because from the time the stabbing first began to the last photo of TA (with JA's foot and pants) there was less than two minutes. The ME said he wouldn't have been immediately incapacitated from the stab wound to the chest.
I have a funny story for you guys ...
I had to go to our court house today and pick up some documents ..I did not carry my purse but I had my scrubs on and had to empty pockets ..so out comes change purse..sun glasses.,,ink pen ...and then my phone and I still had ear piece attached. It got caught on something and unplugs you can hear the trial playing ..the officers all stop and look at me ..I said sorry about that I was listening to the Jodi Arias Trial...these two officers smiled ear to ear and said "now that is one whack job" ..I musta had a dumb look on my face.. and the older one said "no not you hon ..that crazy broad in Arizona" ..we all just laughed ....
Regarding the last line of questioning by Juan today (different scores, one being 17 and the other test scoring 15..yet he only gave her the test once).
1st day of cross exam: Doc could only find the yellow legal paper sheets where her answers were just jotted down (Exhibit 534)
Doc said he could not find the actual scoring sheet but would bring it to court tomorrow
2nd day of cross exam: Doc provided scoring sheet (white papers) which became Exhibit 535. Score of # of symptoms for PTSD = 15
Today: Juan pulls out Exhibit 550 which is also scoring sheets (white papers) which has of score = 17. Juan makes note that this one has the dots filled in. Juan says at no time did the Doc provide this scoring sheet. Doc says he has copies in his "mobile file" so he must have provided it...
Juan then takes the Doc's copy he just produced (of Exhibit 550) and makes it an exhibit (I don't know Exhibit #).
Then it gets real confusing to me. I believe Exhibit 550 had 3 hole punch but Doc's copy didn't (or other way around). Anyway, Doc quickly says he made copies before he punched the holes. Then they go to sidebar and quit for the day.
IMO, Juan thinks Doc has "cheated" and was in the process of trying to prove it.
Wait, what ... did she really say this somewhere?
But he's not a predator - he's diligent and his aggressiveness has integrity.
I call him brilliant and a dogged, tireless soldier of justice for the law and more importantly for the victim and his family.
"How To Make Friends & Influence People"
I wondered about that, too. Do they think people will only focus on Travis being a big meanie to her? Do they not see the words where he not only calls her evil and a sociopath and a game-player, but he tells her to come clean about something she did and how everyone will know about it if she doesn't come clean. He may have said mean things to her, but clearly he had very valid reasons for doing so. She lies continually, not just to law enforcement or juries when she gets caught. He gave her an ultimatum to fess up or else he will reveal what she has done to others. That's a MOTIVE.
Why on earth would they show words from the man that she brutally SLAUGHTERED that reinforce what a psycho B**** she was and IS?
and what happened to the rest of the family. they made a brief appearance then gone...
I wish they would just talk about the trial and what went on each day. I would love for someone to explore what Juan is saying about those exhibits and the discrepancy between the 3-holed paper and the others.
But it doesn't really matter if she brought the knife or not. Nobody will be able to prove that one way or the other. So that was just a stupid premise for the show, imo.
Found it .. Holy hell.
http://www.hlntv.com/video/2013/03/21/dissecting-jodis-interrogation-tapes
She's got to be kidding, at least she was honest for once I guess.
The PDS assessment measures the severity of the patient's PTSD. Yes, the MCMI and the PDS are two different tests. The MCMI has measures to show if the patient has anxiety (which Dr. Samuels implied was r/t her PTSD from being the victim of abuse) and PTSD.Thanks Pensfan. What is the difference between the PDS though, and the test for PTSD? I thought the PDS was to test for PTSD. Or maybe I'm just OTL, or have PMS, need a GPS (lol just being silly). The acronyms are tough sometimes, and I don't quite understand what the PDS is (but at least I didn't screw it up like Wilmott with her PSD lol). Can you explain what the PDS is? TIA.
ETA: Just wondering if these are two different tests, or one in the same. A difference of two points (15 vs 17) might seem like it's not that much, but if it's the same test where he had to "add" points to certain sections to reach the right conclusion it becomes pretty significant.
I do a lot of this http://www.stephaniehart.com/portfolio.htm
And it helps in my P.I. work to do the diagrams, crime scenes you name it.
I agree!! I am the proud owner of a rescued pit bull and she is a big baby. My non-shaking chihuahua bosses her around. I rehabilitate abused pitbulls and always cringe when I hear that expression.
Jodi Arias Giving someone in court the finger - YouTube
the one below that finger is broken and mangled as Brian Carr calls it
Can we compare Martinez to something other than a pit bull, they get enough bad raps. I realize pit bulls are known to be vicious and aggressive, and that's what people want here, but they are also loving pets. Can we choose something like a wolverine or killer shark?
OK - so JM brings out a page that witness added to his book with 3-hole punch and witness says that the reason one has the holes and the other doesn't, the witness claims he took copies of it BEFORE he 3-hole punched it. This is what we are left with over the weekend. The thing I do not like is the DT will figure out where JM is going with this and will coach witness on how to explain. Any ideas?