What professional responsibility does the DT have for the reports this expert (cough) submitted prior to court, continued to add to while on the stand and more importantly the boundaries RS crossed with the defendent when he continued to visit JA in jail after he submitted his report (6/2011) up till Dec. of 2012? After all, RS's actions invalidated the purpose he was hired for, IMO.
Certainly, any shenanigans committed by Dr. Fog that the defense knowingly presented as evidence would be severely sanctioned by the judge...and each lawyer could face sanctions by the AZ bar. But, as I mentioned earlier, JM might not push it that far, because it would likely end with a mistrial--something the defense would love to have at this point, and something to be avoided at all costs for JM.