nursebeeme
Registered User
- Joined
- May 3, 2008
- Messages
- 53,158
- Reaction score
- 220
why is the trial thread closed?
I just made the three new threads for today. They are all currently closed but 115 will open in a bit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
why is the trial thread closed?
*Wapner Edition, because we should be so lucky to get Judge Marilyn Milan to oggle while she eviscerates the deserving.
Allyne, the thing that is a question for me is whether she said these things during the trial, after she had access to all the evidence to shape her story around. Or did she say these things in the interrogation tapes?
If in July 2008, then I agree she would have to be there to know those things. I am not through the unedited tapes yet to know the answer.
When will we know?
Here are a few;
1. She has yet to start a court day on time.
2. She allows JW to openly challenge/argue/pout/stomp her foot to her rulings
3. She allows the DT to bring in testimony that have already been denied in
previous hearings
4. She has no control of her courtroom, i.e. Nurmi addresses her from behind
the table, kicked back in his pseudo lazy boy chair
5. She can't decide on either sustaining or overruling objections by the DT
without calling the attorneys to the sidebar for discussions WAY too often
6. She has allowed things into the trial such as the sex tape with Travis' words
attached with words capitalized which assigns an importance which is so
biased, she allowed RS to remain on the stand while the attorneys argued
over things such as him providing "therapy" to Jodi and then turns to him
to ask him
7. She has allowed experts to include material from sources such as Time
rather than scientific, peer reviewed material
8. She has allowed persons to testify as experts who lack the acceptable
standard qualifications
9. She allows the DT's disrespectful behavior of giggling, eye rolling and head
shaking toward the prosecutor
10. She allows the DT to take up time to discuss things that they could easily
address with her outside of court
11 She allows the DT to ask leading questions ALL the time.
12. She allows witness's to be disrespectful to the Prosecutor, argue with the
prosecutor and other behaviors that aren't appropriate for the courtroom
Plus more but what's the point:facepalm:
Good morning :seeya:
What will today bring? :rocker:
I'd like to add that JSS has allowed Jodi to "sneak" papers in and out of folders at the defense table. I suspect that Jodi has been passing notes via the guards who are assigned to her. :moo:
Here are a few;
1. She has yet to start a court day on time.
2. She allows JW to openly challenge/argue/pout/stomp her foot to her rulings
3. She allows the DT to bring in testimony that have already been denied in
previous hearings
4. She has no control of her courtroom, i.e. Nurmi addresses her from behind
the table, kicked back in his pseudo lazy boy chair
5. She can't decide on either sustaining or overruling objections by the DT
without calling the attorneys to the sidebar for discussions WAY too often
6. She has allowed things into the trial such as the sex tape with Travis' words
attached with words capitalized which assigns an importance which is so
biased, she allowed RS to remain on the stand while the attorneys argued
over things such as him providing "therapy" to Jodi and then turns to him
to ask him
7. She has allowed experts to include material from sources such as Time
rather than scientific, peer reviewed material
8. She has allowed persons to testify as experts who lack the acceptable
standard qualifications
9. She allows the DT's disrespectful behavior of giggling, eye rolling and head
shaking toward the prosecutor
10. She allows the DT to take up time to discuss things that they could easily
address with her outside of court
11 She allows the DT to ask leading questions ALL the time.
12. She allows witness's to be disrespectful to the Prosecutor, argue with the
prosecutor and other behaviors that aren't appropriate for the courtroom
Plus more but what's the point:facepalm:
Here are a few;
1. She has yet to start a court day on time.
2. She allows JW to openly challenge/argue/pout/stomp her foot to her rulings
3. She allows the DT to bring in testimony that have already been denied in
previous hearings
4. She has no control of her courtroom, i.e. Nurmi addresses her from behind
the table, kicked back in his pseudo lazy boy chair :floorlaugh:
5. She can't decide on either sustaining or overruling objections by the DT
without calling the attorneys to the sidebar for discussions WAY too often
I think this one is more the fault of the DT--they constantly interrupt Juan with speaking objections and whining.
6. She has allowed things into the trial such as the sex tape with Travis' words
attached with words capitalized which assigns an importance which is so
biased, she allowed RS to remain on the stand while the attorneys argued
over things such as him providing "therapy" to Jodi and then turns to him
to ask him :furious:ITA
7. She has allowed experts to include material from sources such as Time
rather than scientific, peer reviewed material
8. She has allowed persons to testify as experts who lack the acceptable
standard qualifications
9. She allows the DT's disrespectful behavior of giggling, eye rolling and head
shaking toward the prosecutor ITA
10. She allows the DT to take up time to discuss things that they could easily
address with her outside of court
11 She allows the DT to ask leading questions ALL the time.
12. She allows witness's to be disrespectful to the Prosecutor, argue with the
prosecutor and other behaviors that aren't appropriate for the courtroom
Plus more but what's the point:facepalm:
:truce: Is it safe to come out? Everything I said yesterday was taken wrong lol. Has the moon started waning? lease:
Nice.
Nurmi wants out yet again. And if a mistrial is granted, this who spectacle can start all over with a new DT, and D witness'. :twocents:
I think the DT should just move their table smack up against the Judge's to save time on the sidebars. Wilmott should have a permanent bench there to prevent the carpet from being worn out.
If tri colour is kicked off she is going to be pi$$ed. She has invested her time and energy into this case, has been taking notes diligently and now this! It's not good for anyone to have as part of one's background 'Dismissed from a high profile trial due to juror misconduct'!
I am assuming she didn't do anything wrong. Even if she did make remarks which imply she is pro-prosecution, who could blame the poor girl? I think she is one of those who will speak once the trial is over regardless of whether stays or not.
Good morning :seeya:
What will today bring? :rocker:
Damn the DT! (is one allowed to say that?) I am sick of them.
If she does get dismissed I hope she doesn't get pi**ed - and if she cares about this case she will know that getting dismissed is better than a Mistrial! :twocents::seeya:
I watched that a couple of times.
Detective walks in and says a few words, then says - did you take any paper?
Jodi - yes
Detective: where is it
Jodi pulls it out of her pants
I heard that when you are being interrogated, there is always someone watching - especially if you are in the room alone. There were eyes (IMHO) behind the camera watching to see if she would say anything when she was alone...or just in case she did something stoopid.
The detective (IMHO) already knew she stashed the paper in her pants before entering the room.
It's a good interrogation tactic, too, to observe someone you arrested while alone. Folks give off body language, and are more apt to talk out loud. Jodi, on the other hand, gave them so much more to observe. I wonder if they were LOL when she stood on her head?
:floorlaugh:
MOO
Mel