elepher50
Help find Adji
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2008
- Messages
- 6,095
- Reaction score
- 94
Here are my thoughts on Boston Baby Doe. Since Baby Doe was found on June 25th/15 and was starting to decompose it is possible that she was alive as recent as 19th or 20th of June/15. The authorities have stated that there are no obvious signs of trauma on the body which leads me to believe that Baby Doe was placed on the shoreline and not washed in with the tide. If Baby Doe had been washed in with the tide, the tides are full of sticks and various objects which probably would have caused marks on her body.
I really believe that Baby Doe was placed on the shoreline just after tide turned to go 'back out' on the night/early morning of the 25th. The authorities have stated that Baby Doe was not in the water very long. I do believe that Baby Doe was already deceased for at least 3-4 days (either died on the 21st or 22nd of June/15).
It is my belief (and I stand to be corrected on this) that footprints of newborn babies are taken and submitted for birth registration and in some states dna samples may also be taken. What effort would it take to check with each of the birthing hospitals in the Boston area to see if they did take dna samples of newborns and what records they have of females born 4 years ago.
Like I said these are just my thoughts and any corrections/clarifications are willingly accepted. Just trying to think outside the box.
It is outrageous that nobody has come forward to identify this precious baby and it makes me sick to my stomach to think that someone has the nerve to put a baby in a garbage bag like a piece of trash. How dare they - seriously how dare they. Yes, I am spitting angry.
I really believe that Baby Doe was placed on the shoreline just after tide turned to go 'back out' on the night/early morning of the 25th. The authorities have stated that Baby Doe was not in the water very long. I do believe that Baby Doe was already deceased for at least 3-4 days (either died on the 21st or 22nd of June/15).
It is my belief (and I stand to be corrected on this) that footprints of newborn babies are taken and submitted for birth registration and in some states dna samples may also be taken. What effort would it take to check with each of the birthing hospitals in the Boston area to see if they did take dna samples of newborns and what records they have of females born 4 years ago.
Like I said these are just my thoughts and any corrections/clarifications are willingly accepted. Just trying to think outside the box.
It is outrageous that nobody has come forward to identify this precious baby and it makes me sick to my stomach to think that someone has the nerve to put a baby in a garbage bag like a piece of trash. How dare they - seriously how dare they. Yes, I am spitting angry.