To further this thought, does anyone have a diagram or image mapping out where JO, his shoe, hat, parked cars, tail light fragments etc..were found in relation to each other?
Hahaha, that's a good one
Yeah - I was thinking if there was something, it would come from someone here - certainly not LE!Hahaha, that's a good one
Seriously, that would require competent investigators. These guys could not even manage to get a picture of a broken taillight for several days.
Closest we got was from Trooper Paul on Friday. Check the last thread where they were posted several times Friday.
I live in a town quite similar to Canton, but outside the Chicago area. I can get an Uber or Lyft at my home within 10 minutes, any time day or night. It is just so irritating. Many of these are the same people who wouldn't think twice about locking someone like me or you up for DUI, yet they seem to have the "rules for thee but not me" attitude.
Or just a good old fashioned private hire local taxi company?
RSBM
Did wcvb ever include info regarding the cross exam of Paul? The way this is summarized makes it appear that Paul was never challenged with the fact that he didn't even line up the two vehicles next to one another for measurement comparison.Live updates:
- 4:35 p.m. Judge says she will decide over the weekend whether Trooper Paul can testify about the taillight damage.
- 4:01 p.m. Paul says the damage to Read's taillight is not consistent with a low-speed collision with O'Keefe's vehicle. Paul says the vehicles' bumpers would have made contact instead of the taillights.
- 3:55 p.m. Judge dismisses the jury for the day but continues with a voir dire hearing about the Ring camera video. Trooper Paul testifies that he does not see any snow fall from O'Keefe's vehicle when they come close or in contact.
- 3:42 p.m. Lally wants to show Trooper Paul the Ring camera video of Read's SUV backing up in his driveway, when it comes close to or in contact with O'Keefe's car. Jackson objects. Sidebar.
- 3:05 p.m. Paul says O'Keefe was thrown forward, then spun counter clockwise and fell backwards and hit his head.
- 3 p.m. Paul says O'Keefe's injuries were also consistent with being hit by a vehicle.
- 3 p.m. Paul says chart shows Read's vehicle travelled just over 97 feet in reverse. Says this data is "consistent with a pedestrian strike."
- 2:30 p.m. Trooper Paul shows data from Read's Lexus SUV.
- 1:50 p.m. Testimony resumes with Trooper Paul after lunch break.
- 12:35 p.m. Trooper Paul points out that Fairview Rd is a double-laned road with a rounded curb on the side where the former Albert home is located and a sidewalk on the opposite side.
- 12:30 p.m. The courtroom camera has been turned back on. Testimony resumes with Trooper Joe Paul, an crash reconstructionist who says he has investigated 196 crashes including about 55 involving pedestrians.
- 12 p.m. David Yannetti begins cross-examination of Hyde. Asks if it's possible that the google search could have been done at 2:27am. Hyde says no indication of a Google search at that time.
- 11:45 a.m. This backs up Jen McCabe's testimony that she used her phone to look up basketball info in the middle of the night, then used it after O'Keefe was found - at Read's request - to search for info about hypothermia.
- 11:40 a.m. Hyde's bottom line: Search for sports was done at 2:27am and search for "hos long to die in cold" was done at 6:23am and 6:24am. She says no evidence of any purposeful deletions.
- 11:07 a.m. Hyde says another search was initiated at 6:22:49am for info about how long to die in the cold. Then another at 6:23:51am.
- 11:05 a.m. Hyde says she found a search for "hos long to die in cold" with timestamp at 2:27am. But says that timestamp "is not the time necessarily of this search." Says there's a high likelihood that the timestamp applies to when tab was opened for another sports-related search.
- 10:55 a.m. Hyde says one of the tools found the phrase "hos long to die in cold."
- 10:50 a.m. Hyde says she used one of the tools to focus on Safari history for the date 1/29/22.
- 10:45 a.m. Hyde says she analyzed data from Jen McCabe's phone using multiple tools.
- 10:35 a.m. Next prosecution witness: Jessica Hyde, owner of a digital forensics company called Hexordia.
- 10:30 a.m. Judge notes that the juror is missing. Says the reasons is "personal" to that juror. Says they others should not consider it.
- 10:16 a.m. The juror holds up her hand as if to have good-bye and exits the courtroom.
- 10:15 a.m. Now the first juror is back for a third third trip to the bench.
- 10:10 a.m. Now another one of the previously questioned jurors is back at sidebar for less than a minute and leaves again. I think she was the third one.
- 10:05 a.m. Now the original juror who was brought in this morning has been brought back. She's back at the bench talking with judge and attorneys.
- 9:57 a.m. Now a FOURTH juror has been brought in for private questioning by the judge.
- 9:55 a.m. Now a THIRD juror has entered the courtroom and is speaking with the judge at sidebar. The juror is laughing and seems at ease. All three jurors brought in so far are women.
- 9:50 a.m. Reminder: a male juror was dismissed earlier this week for "personal" reasons. There are currently 16 jurors on the panel.
- 9:45 a.m. Now a different juror has been brought in for a private conversation with the judge and attorneys at sidebar. This is NOT the same juror as the one brought in earlier.
- 9:35 a.m. Judge returns to the bench and calls attorney to sidebar. The courtroom camera is still off.
- 9:20 a.m. The judge orders the courtroom camera turned off. The juror exits and the judge orders a recess. It's not yet clear why the juror was brought in. Nor if she is being dismissed.
- 9:10 a.m. The judge enters and calls the attorneys to a sidebar. Then they bring in one of the jurors and are now speaking to her privately. The other jurors are absent.
- Good morning. Day 25 of testimony. On Thursday, Lt. Brian Tully testified Read would have had enough time to return to house where she'd allegedly left John O'Keefe in the snow before going to ask for help to find him.
Karen Read trial: Crash expert says injuries 'consistent' with SUV strike
Read is accused of killing her boyfriend, a Boston police officer, by striking him with an SUV and leaving him to die in a snowbank.www.wcvb.com
I wonder if the ME will testify to being pressured into a homicide determination.
Or that Paul is a forensic expert and can testify to OJO's injuries (insert gif of spinning Simone Biles here).
Insert image of shoe flying over the car.
