Curiousobserver
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2018
- Messages
- 2,517
- Reaction score
- 27,865
YES! finally someone who gets it. Even Karen Reed thought hitting him was how it happened.My point was that there is some extreme denial when it comes to Karen's own words and actions implicating her in this crime.
People can't understand why John's family believes Karen is guilty. Part of that is that they believe their niece/granddaughter when she says that Karen's story kept changing depending on who she was talking to that morning. They believe John's childhood friend who says that Karen called and said John was dead and was worried about being responsible for it or that he was hit by a snowplow.
It's then a huge coincidence that they go to 34 Fairview, and the Alberts had allegedly thrown him out on the front lawn and the plan was to blame it on the snowplow guy. I mean, what kind of odds?? Kerry Roberts know for a fact what Karen said to her. There is no reason for her to have a preference for who gets charged for her friend's murder.
I am not saying that people are wrong for taking the experts the FBI hired word for it when they say that her car didn't hit him. I am saying that people are being intentionally obtuse when it comes to anything Karen did that is suspicious.
The counter story is that a house full of adults, including police officers, tried to cover up a drunk fight by murdering one of their fellow police officers by letting him freeze to death in the cold out in front of their own house. Then the geniuses searched for how long to leave him there on google. That they coordinated this in a serious of seconds-long phone calls and were able to plant tail light pieces at the scene, on his clothes, plant his DNA on the tail light, remembered to put his phone in airplane mode when he got inside, and then brought it back out and place it under his body with the glass and all of the pieces.