Hm yes I recall the media reporting that there was footage of KR hitting JO.I believe they know. You are right, it's my opinion. But also, Yannetti was not making arguments for her innocence when she was first charged. He said it was an innocent accident and questioned how stiff the charges were. I'm reasonably certain that at least he knows.
Personally, appears pre prepared. Not sure there is room to open minds in there and judge instruction to do so will fall flat. mooThe note from the jury has the polished touch that makes me feel it is AI-generated, created by running it through chatgpt.com
Seriously I feel like if Karen came right out and said I did it, I hit him. People would think she’s lying cause the experts said so. Totally agree with your view but I would say she’s guilty of the lesser charges.I believe they know. You are right, it's my opinion. But also, Yannetti was not making arguments for her innocence when she was first charged. He said it was an innocent accident and questioned how stiff the charges were. I'm reasonably certain that at least he knows.
Maybe the jurors should be questioned re composition of notes. Are there any grounds for that?They were just home all weekend. Someone could easily have googled “hos to get judge to declare mistrial”
Seriously I feel like if Karen came right out and said I did it, I hit him. People would think she’s lying cause the experts said so. Totally agree with your view but I would say she’s guilty of the lesser charges.
Yes, as we know, cops are allowed to lie to suspects. I don't really care for that, though. I was watching something the other day about how they have stopped allowing cops to lie to suspects in the UK. I think that needs to happen here.Hm yes I recall the media reporting that there was footage of KR hitting JO.
Perhaps that influenced Yannetti at the time.
Of course, it turned out the footage never existed.
Imagine that!
It would be exactly the same as this one unless they move it out of State, which is probably what they should have done to begin with.This has been such an excellent defense and I would not want to have the responsibility of convicting KR if she is not guilty, nor would I want to acquit her if she's indeed guilty.
It's a big decision for this jury to have to make for either side - because of the thorough defense she had. It's amazing what her defense dug up on these so-called law enforcement employees. With a hung jury, it won't be their responsibility for the decision any longer. With the FBI involvement (which the jury supposedly doesn't know about), I can't imagine any new trial being remotely similar to this one. MOO.
Seriously I feel like if Karen came right out and said I did it, I hit him. People would think she’s lying cause the experts said so. Totally agree with your view but I would say she’s guilty of the lesser charges.
I don’t feel he’s lying by what he presented but it could have happened other ways. Tail lights at the scene and in his clothes tells me it happened, we just don’t know exactly how. We’ve been around on this…..Seriously, I feel like if FBI biomechanical experts came right out and said he wasn't hit by a car (they did), people would think they're lying because they're experts NOT hired by the defense.
It would be a really bad idea to retry this case. And if they did defense is going to bring in the FBI.It’s a polarizing case, I don’t blame the jurors for not changing, I’m NG myself but I could see how some would see it as G, judge is just holding these jurors hostage at this point
I don’t think they re-try this case
- 11:10 a.m.: The jurors file out. No smiles. One woman seems to be slightly emotional. The foreman looked solemn and has loosened his necktie since he arrived two hours ago.
- 11:03 a.m.: Reminder: After the judge reads the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction, if the jury comes back AGAIN and is still deadlocked, she must declare a hung jury and dismiss them.
- 11:02 a.m.: The judge has returned to her chamber. The O'Keefe family arrives. Court officer calls for the jury to be brought in. She reads Tuey-Rodriguez instruction.
- 10:51 a.m.: Judge says she will give Tuey-Rodriguez instruction. The instructions tell the jurors they are the best hope for reaching a verdict and encourage them to look at the arguments from the other side.
- 10:50 a.m.: Judge asks Lally whether to argue whether he believes jury has done due and diligent deliberations. (Sounds as if the jury is still deadlocked.)
- 10:42 a.m.: Court clerk says the jury has a question.
- 9:07 a.m.: Reminder: The jury has no access to transcripts of witnesses' testimony. They must rely on their memories and personal notes. If jurors disagree about what a witness said, there's no way to check.
- 9:05 a.m.: The court officers wheel the evidence boxes and bags through the hall. We can't actually see the deliberations room door. It's in a part of the courthouse off limits to the public.
- 9:03 a.m.: For what it's worth, several jurors seem to be dressed in black, and for the first time, the foreman was wearing a tie.
- 9:01 a.m.: The judge asks her standard questions and sends the jury back into deliberations.
- 8:59 a.m.: The jury enters. The judge is on the bench.
- 8:57 a.m.: We've reassembled in the courtroom with the lawyers and families. Waiting on the jury and the judge.
Updated: 11:49 AM EDT Jul 1, 2024![]()
Karen Read mistrial: Judge gave jury several chances to reach verdict
Jurors deliberating in the trial of Karen Read were urged three times to overcome their differences but were unable to reach a unanimous verdict.www.wcvb.com