The right call would be to not have the children involved.
Just absurd.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The right call would be to not have the children involved.
Are the reporters remaining for the testimony?
BH loves the passive voice and "if I did it".
Yes Honestly lol - we could not be further apart in our opinionsHonestly? I am not the proponent of “thin blue line”, just trying to be practical (the famous anarchist armies ended up with own police, so much for police-less society).
Honestly, at this point in time, I can’t even define how wealthy Canton is. Per data, wealthier than my area, but it is hard to process or believe knowing that the biggest employer of Canton is Dunkin’ Donuts. My feeling is, just a blue collar one, no?
So, no sure how “influential family” fares in an 28K blue collar town? But, surely the cops had the chance to check KR’s income or connections when she moved in with JO?
Sometimes I wonder if this case is way more political than we think, and whom it really targets, but I am too far to hear any “local” news.
Anyhow, unprofessional behavior of people like Proctor should have consequences. So should witness intimidation of certain bloggers. By the same token, if we are investigating the connections between BA and MP, should the same be done about AK and KR?
Thank you Universecalling! And lest we not forget, IIRC most persons involved in this case (i.e. KR) had been heavily drinking that evening too. Probability of that taillight lens ‘replacement’ having happened shrinks to less than zero. Or if one prefers, allows for considerable reasonable doubt of that having happened.Respectfully, the plausibility of KR finding a new taillight (a specific one for her expensive, foreign car), in the snow storm at 3 am, affixing it or someone doing it for her, is FAR less plausible than evidence being collected in red solo cups.
If you gave me those two possibilities, I’d say solo cups are more plausible. And that says a lot.
The girl (so sorry to have forgotten her name) spoke with KR the morning in question so I get that but the boy I agree,no reason and agree it's wrong to get them to speak to arguments or what they over heard week before JO died, not material and not ethical and could be emotionally damaging for them if/when kr is found ng. children are not witness to any crime being committed by kr jmoThe right call would be to not have the children involved.
Just absurd.
NoAre the reporters remaining for the testimony?
Thanks’
Here is what I read earlier about reporters remaining@FallRiverReport
Good morning. We are here at Norfolk Superior Court for the #KarenRead trial. Today is going to be a very emotional day. I have been told that after Higgins has completed his time on the stand, John O'Keefe's niece and nephew will be called to testify.
The rules surrounding minors testifying are obviously different. From my understanding, there will be no video and no audio of their testimony on the stand today.
It seems as if the only way for the public to know what is asked and answered during their testimony today will be what is reported by those of us in the press box.
We are allowed to share the dialog with you but can not give their names, nor any other personal information.
While we wait for everyone, Karen and her team are here today, minus Jackson, who we knew would not be here today. Karen's family is also here and seated.
I believe reporters are in court listening but they cannot take notes on the children's testimony. They can only report after the fact.Here is what I read earlier about reporters remaining
heard it was with the other side of family, but not positive. MOI believe reporters are in court listening but they cannot take notes on the children's testimony. They can only report after the fact.
I keep reading that JO was in a custody battle with someone for the niece and nephew before he was awarded custody? Was that with his own mother?
Thanks, that seems to be the consensus now. I guess we have to rely on reporters' memories. Ugh.I believe reporters are in court listening but they cannot take notes on the children's testimony. They can only report after the fact.
I keep reading that JO was in a custody battle with someone for the niece and nephew before he was awarded custody? Was that with his own mother?
Yes, I believe or heard it was his mother.I believe reporters are in court listening but they cannot take notes on the children's testimony. They can only report after the fact.
I keep reading that JO was in a custody battle with someone for the niece and nephew before he was awarded custody? Was that with his own mother?
I believe reporters are in court listening but they cannot take notes on the children's testimony. They can only report after the fact.
I keep reading that JO was in a custody battle with someone for the niece and nephew before he was awarded custody? Was that with his own mother?
the judge asked them to leave the courtroom when I was listening before the video stoppedI thought reporters were staying for the children's testimony? Thought I read that earlier?
Are the reporters remaining for the testimony?