nodamselindistress
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2020
- Messages
- 2,453
- Reaction score
- 26,414
The corruption is wide spread it seems. Glad the citizens are asking for an audit of the PD.
So much to say about the tail light pieces !
If I were on the jury, knowing the Solo Cup Collection history of CPD, the use of leaf blowers, Stop&Shop grocery bags, I would already be doubting any other 'evidence' collected on scene.
Speaking of scene. The crime scene was never secured. There was not a tent, canopy or even crime scene tape up ( after 8 am). Not a cruiser in site parked near the Albert house, to keep an eye on things. Even after KR was targeted for the death of JOK. Brian Albert wanted secrecy and silence. Pay no attention to the Albert Home on 34 Fairview. Recall the initial report, listing the address as 32 Fairview, and his name as Albert, B. Ssshhhh.... Don't look here...look there!
And then suddenly, while no one was "watching" the miraculous discovery of sprinkles of red tail light.
Yeah...No
I think we'll learn the shards of taillight were absolutely messed with. I'm not exactly sure how, but I hope it will come out in the testimony once they finally get to the physical evidence.
And I think the taillight is key because it played a large part in how this case was charged.
Without the shards, this would be a very different case.
- A broken taillight means that the collision with John had to be a significant one, not just a bump.
- Which means that Karen's car had to be reversing at a high rate of speed.
- Therefore Karen couldn't have accidentally hit him. She had to have driven forward, then shifted into reverse, mashed the accelerator and aimed to hit John, who for some reason was standing in the road while she did this.
- And so she gets charged with 2nd degree murder even though the wounds to John's body are not consistent with a high-speed collision.
I suspect it will come to light that BH and the Chief were in the sally port with KR’s car for an extended period of time and the film showing that - you guessed it - is missing.For me, the outcome of this trial depends on the darn tail light pieces. Can defense actually convince a jury that one or more persons were responsible for gathering her tail light pieces and placing them on the lawn?
That definitely caught my attention and why I think he could have also hit JO. I think KR bumped JO and/or possibly he was at the edge of the yard bent over getting sick and BH hit him with the plow. That could be the reason he returned to the station…..cleaning up the plow. Possibly a few in the house seen or heard it and they are covering for him.I can't get my mind off the fact that BH heard his plow grinding on the ground before driving away. (the neighbors could have heard it to, lets explain that away), and that the plaintiffs cleaned up snow from the crime scene. There was no valid reason that BH would have lowered his plow before entering the house, and no valid reason that I can envision that the Plaintiffs would clean up snow from the crime scene.
There's also no body damage to Read's vehicle. None. She's sends a 6'2" 220 pound man flying 12 feet sideways onto the lawn and only damages her taillight? The biomechanical experts will do the math for us, but I doubt it's even possible.
And we're to believe coatless John stood in the roadway in freezing temps by the flagpole and just watched her maneuver a total of over 120 feet without stepping out of the way?
Can't get on board with this theory. I do not believe the whole <modsnip - derogatory nickname> clan would lie to cover up for something Higgins did alone. Besides, what you describe could easily be deemed an accident. Why not report that to your buddy police chief?That definitely caught my attention and why I think he could have also hit JO. I think KR bumped JO and/or possibly he was at the edge of the yard bent over getting sick and BH hit him with the plow. That could be the reason he returned to the station…..cleaning up the plow. Possibly a few in the house seen or heard it and they are covering for him.
If the tail light is indeed in tact at 5 a.m., when was it ever broken? Seems very skeevy and usually before a car is towed it would be photographed at the site of the accident- ? No?I was thinking about that too but I suddenly realised planting side of it is icing' on the cake. Because if defense are successful in showing that KR's passenger side tail light was intact at five am.,then jury cannot logically conclude that the shards got there via impact with KR's lexus at 12.30 am. The cw's case falls apart right there if you see what I mean. moo
eta so thinking it through further seems the cw are going to need to go hells bells with some expert to try and convince jury that yet another piece of digital evidence, the five am ring cam footage in this instance, is wrong in some way. That has to be priority one for the cw imo or seems to me case falls apart completely.jmo
BH said he gave the Albert's driveway a 'sweep' before parking, I assume on the street. I forget etc when he said he heard his plow down and secured it up. It better be once he finished the sweep IN the driveway. Then went and backed out and parked on the street. He'd of heard the plow scraping then otherwise. Because that is how one handles your plow. But, I don't know how he handles it.I can't get my mind off the fact that BH heard his plow grinding on the ground before driving away. (the neighbors could have heard it to, lets explain that away), and that the plaintiffs cleaned up snow from the crime scene. There was no valid reason that BH would have lowered his plow before entering the house, and no valid reason that I can envision that the Plaintiffs would clean up snow from the crime scene.
Right, to him he was giving a 'help', tho a regular plower wouldn't of done it. That would be because usually the local plowers own their EXPENSIVE plow and are very careful with it and the mechanisms that work it and attached to their pick up trucks or perhaps jeeps. (I've only noticed pick up trucks and of course the big town owned dump trucks using them.a quick sweeping for a dusting of snow would have damaged the plow, unlikely he did that. However there is a theory he was hit by a snow plow. It sure was not a public works plow.
Has Lally shared details from the Event Data Recorder in KR's Lexus with you?Actually I think the black box on her car will seal her fate……
I’m thinking he will unless there is none.Has Lally shared details from the Event Data Recorder in KR's Lexus with you?
You would think he might want to share them with the jury at this point if they are so damning.
Agree one of their “kin” perhaps Colin had to be involved. And it escalated.Can't get on board with this theory. I do not believe the whole McAlbert clan would lie to cover up for something Higgins did alone. Besides, what you describe could easily be deemed an accident. Why not report that to your buddy police chief?
I know at one time the CW was saying they had this and it was incriminating but yet defense was saying they weren’t turning it over. If they had it you’d think they would’ve led with that and case closed. So my guess is they either never had it or never turned it over so can’t use it.Actually I think the black box on her car will seal her fate……
Because accident or not, it’s drinking and driving. Heck this case has so many twist and turns it makes me crazy.Can't get on board with this theory. I do not believe the whole McAlbert clan would lie to cover up for something Higgins did alone. Besides, what you describe could easily be deemed an accident. Why not report that to your buddy police chief?
There’s that key word - usually.If the tail light is indeed in tact at 5 a.m., when was it ever broken? Seems very skeevy and usually before a car is towed it would be photographed at the site of the accident- ? No?
Seriously shocking no one is screaming for that information.I know at one time the CW was saying they had this and it was incriminating but yet defense was saying they weren’t turning it over. If they had it you’d think they would’ve led with that and case closed. So my guess is they either never had it or never turned it over so can’t use it.