RANCH
United we stand, divided we fall.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 18,077
- Reaction score
- 37,791
Like I said, it's hard for me to say what to believe.Did she get lost?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like I said, it's hard for me to say what to believe.Did she get lost?
I wouldnt have left there without his sorry backsideSo, you would have gone looking?
She really didn't, that's why she went looking for him.MOshe knew where he was.
My absolute favorite was when he used a punching bag dummy to test. Dummy was the same hight or taller than “expert” Paul (according to Paul’s testimony).So the Keystone cops in their little demonstration drove in reverse on a STRAIGHT road when it's painfully obvious there was a curve in the road at the so called crime scene. No measurements were shown or identified in that experiment. No measurements on the crime scene of how far things were from each other were provided. No diagrams were made showing where the hit occurred or where they thought KR was when she went in reverse. Nothing. Just some vague arrows. This is comparing apples and tulips in my opinion. My Gawd I've seen 5th grade science experiments done with better attention to detail.
Why didn't she know where he was? He was found were she left him. JMO.She really didn't, that's why she went looking for him.MO
But otherwise, a sickening disgrace.My absolute favorite was when he used a punching bag dummy to test. Dummy was the same hight or taller than “expert” Paul (according to Paul’s testimony).
Then Lally, to his own detriment, asked Pauly how tall he was and he said 5’6.
It would be funny, but it’s quite tragic considering JO was 6’2.
What a disgrace this investigation and its investigators are.
Dave and Buster should go on Master Chef. They’d win the whole thing.He's getting killed on this dire voir right now wow
snipped.SHE HAS A PHONE... HE HAS A PHONE....
they all got phones.
to communicate.
That is her defence and alibi saying that. Is it true?? lol MAYBE?? maybe not. thats the key though isnt it. unknown.She really didn't, that's why she went looking for him.MO
Same as “hos long” witness today.He was ordered to investigate it only within the police assumptions which made it a very narrow investigation.
Because she had no contact with him after leaving fairview and hadn't heard from him all night. You know that.MOOWhy didn't she know where he was? He was found were she left him. JMO.
We saw the commonwealth's evidence today that she drove past the Albert residence and it was hardly definitive. The cell tower data could just as easily suggest that she drove past the Waterfall not 34 Fairview.That is her defence and alibi saying that. Is it true?? lol MAYBE?? maybe not. thats the key though isnt it. unknown.
We factually know.
she dropped him off there.
She drove there....in a car.
so its a big leap of faith to believe that she "forgot"...
or she was black out drunk....
Now the black out drunk theory creates its whole world of other implications for Karen.
Doesn't matter what road you want to take...
all of them lead to KR and her behaviour and actions stinks of guilty knowledge.
Counterpoint - I’ve been in this exact situation.It doesn't make sense her driving around looking for him.
He was at his friends house. According to her.
It was a blizzard outside.
There is no chance JO was out wandering around in it.
Her behaviour reeks of someone in a frenzy who had done something terrible and dire and was still trying to work out what the heck to do with the nightmare she had created.
moo
And that’s what exactly she did that morning: COMMUNICATE. She called friends, JO’s family, had her niece contact JM, called JO himself countless times.This isn't the 1800's
JO was according to Karen ......
at that house.
nothing was wrong and JO was keen to get in there.
so her perspective HAS TO BE....
with a large group of friends drunk and cozy warm in a beautiful house having fun till they all fell asleep probably in a bed or on the floor in front of the fire.
SHE HAS A PHONE... HE HAS A PHONE....
they all got phones.
to communicate.
Karen had no purpose roaming around in a blizzard panicking about where was JO.
She knew where JO was.
come on now.
That means she had no information that he had left Fairview.Because she had no contact with him after leaving fairview and hadn't heard from him all night. You know that.MOO
That's your theory and I have mine.JMOThat is her defence and alibi saying that. Is it true?? lol MAYBE?? maybe not. thats the key though isnt it. unknown.
We factually know.
she dropped him off there.
She drove there....in a car.
so its a big leap of faith to believe that she "forgot"...
or she was black out drunk....
Now the black out drunk theory creates its whole world of other implications for Karen.
Doesn't matter what road you want to take...
all of them lead to KR and her behaviour and actions stinks of guilty knowledge.
RBBMThis isn't the 1800's
JO was according to Karen ......
at that house.
nothing was wrong and JO was keen to get in there.
so her perspective HAS TO BE....
with a large group of friends drunk and cozy warm in a beautiful house having fun till they all fell asleep probably in a bed or on the floor in front of the fire.
SHE HAS A PHONE... HE HAS A PHONE....
they all got phones.
to communicate.
Karen had no purpose roaming around in a blizzard panicking about where was JO.
She knew where JO was.
come on now.
she did indeed have multiple people who was there phone numbers.snipped.
The whole point is that John wasn't answering his phone. All Karen's calls were going to voicemail. That's exactly why she was panicking.
I get that for some people that wouldn't be a big deal. Maybe they're used to their partner sleeping off their hangover in some random location. But that's definitely not true for everyone. Karen's being worried sick because her partner didn't come home does not make her some kind of weirdo or suggest that she's obviously guilty.
The mileage isn’t the important information here. It’s how many times her car was turned on. Knowing even the minimal times her car was driven between 1/29 and 2/1, we can already see the huge issue with the alleged car data from Trooper Paul. That data is not from 1/29.We already know KR went straight to JOKs house due to the timeline. Any extra mileage was from looking all over the place running around looking for JOK. My opinion is that she simply did not remember. She thought he was left a the bar. Forgot about dropping him off but didn't remember where 34F was.
I guess there is no reason to worry if you are used to your SO staying out all night without you. Some people don't live that way.JMOOThat means she had no information that he had left Fairview.
So no reason to believe he wasn't still there. JMO.