wenwe4
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2008
- Messages
- 9,499
- Reaction score
- 7,359
I remember seeing the "violation of an abuse prevention order" charge and my initial thought was that (since it was worded with the animal cruelty statement) the animal protection people had been to this home a couple of times and the family had been warned to not leave the dog outside without food & water or shelter during cold temperatures.
My only other thought is that this is the Mass. "usual" wording when children are placed into Child Protective services care, as child abuse & neglect laws are always in effect. (?) Since this family had not had any contact with CPS within the past year - there was no current CPS order (as those cases are usually closed 1 to 1.5 years after they have placed kids in foster/kinship care).
Either way, I don't think RR was charged with this charge - only EM. It has been reported that RR has only been charged with the pot charges, and I doubt those will carry more than a misdemeanor penalty (depending on the amount found and Mass. laws).
Does anyone think that they will announce the ME findings on the deceased infants or do you all think they will wait for trial?
My only other thought is that this is the Mass. "usual" wording when children are placed into Child Protective services care, as child abuse & neglect laws are always in effect. (?) Since this family had not had any contact with CPS within the past year - there was no current CPS order (as those cases are usually closed 1 to 1.5 years after they have placed kids in foster/kinship care).
Either way, I don't think RR was charged with this charge - only EM. It has been reported that RR has only been charged with the pot charges, and I doubt those will carry more than a misdemeanor penalty (depending on the amount found and Mass. laws).
Does anyone think that they will announce the ME findings on the deceased infants or do you all think they will wait for trial?